764 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31860144)
1. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Att W; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 33094878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner.
Koseoglu M; Kahramanoglu E; Akin H
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):811-816. PubMed ID: 33533100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy assessment (trueness and precision) of a confocal based intraoral scanner under twelve different ambient lighting conditions.
Piedra-Cascón W; Adhikari RR; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR; Revilla-León M; Gallas-Torreira M
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104530. PubMed ID: 37116740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Lighting Conditions on the Mesh Quality of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):651-655. PubMed ID: 32463965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):575-580. PubMed ID: 31870612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.
Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of tooth color on the accuracy of intraoral complete arch scanning under different light conditions using a zirconia restoration model.
Zhou Y; Fu L; Zhang Z; Tang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):145.e1-145.e8. PubMed ID: 37923645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
