321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31860635)
1. A New Application of Multimodality Radiomics Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in Patients with Microcalcifications-Only in Mammography.
Chen S; Guan X; Shu Z; Li Y; Cao W; Dong F; Zhang M; Shao G; Shao F
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Dec; 25():9786-9793. PubMed ID: 31860635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diffusion-weighted imaging texture features in differentiation of malignant from benign nonpalpable breast lesions for patients with microcalcifications-only in mammography].
Chen S; Shao G; Shao F; Zhang M
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 47(4):400-404. PubMed ID: 30511528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging and mammography on patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Li E; Li J; Song Y; Xue M; Zhou C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111217. PubMed ID: 25365327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.
Rößler AC; Kalender W; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Preuss C; Peter SC; Brehm B; Hammon M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 27888024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI.
Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Bhooshan N; Sennett CA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1158-67. PubMed ID: 20692620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent-free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.
Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Kickingereder P; Steudle F; Lederer W; Daniel H; Götz M; Gählert N; Tichy D; Wiesenfarth M; Laun FB; Maier-Hein KH; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):604-616. PubMed ID: 28152264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.
Hrkac Pustahija A; Ivanac G; Brkljacic B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Jul; 24(4):187-194. PubMed ID: 30091708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.
Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer: Additive Value of Radiomics of Breast Parenchyma.
Li H; Mendel KR; Lan L; Sheth D; Giger ML
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 30747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
