These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31861473)

  • 1. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interaction Based on the Positional Similarity Scores Derived from Amino Acid Sequences.
    Karasev D; Sobolev B; Lagunin A; Filimonov D; Poroikov V
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 31861473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of amino acid positions specific for functional groups in a protein family based on local sequence similarity.
    Karasev DA; Veselovsky AV; Oparina NY; Filimonov DA; Sobolev BN
    J Mol Recognit; 2016 Apr; 29(4):159-69. PubMed ID: 26549790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Protein-ligand Interaction Based on Sequence Similarity and Ligand Structural Features.
    Karasev D; Sobolev B; Lagunin A; Filimonov D; Poroikov V
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 33142754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting ligand binding residues and functional sites using multipositional correlations with graph theoretic clustering and kernel CCA.
    González AJ; Liao L; Wu CH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):992-1001. PubMed ID: 22025754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H; Kryshtafovych A; Prusis P; Fidelis K; Wikberg JE; Komorowski J; Hvidsten TR
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins.
    Ahmad S; Sarai A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():33. PubMed ID: 15720719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of Protein Pairs Sharing Common Active Ligands Using Protein Sequence, Structure, and Ligand Similarity.
    Chen YC; Tolbert R; Aronov AM; McGaughey G; Walters WP; Meireles L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Sep; 56(9):1734-45. PubMed ID: 27559831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins.
    Landgraf R; Xenarios I; Eisenberg D
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 307(5):1487-502. PubMed ID: 11292355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    Hannenhalli SS; Russell RB
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 11021970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting target-ligand interactions using protein ligand-binding site and ligand substructures.
    Wang C; Liu J; Luo F; Deng Z; Hu QN
    BMC Syst Biol; 2015; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 25707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative assessment of strategies to identify similar ligand-binding pockets in proteins.
    Govindaraj RG; Brylinski M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 29523085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency analysis of similarity between multiple alignments: prediction of protein function and fold structure from analysis of local sequence motifs.
    Kunin V; Chan B; Sitbon E; Lithwick G; Pietrokovski S
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):939-49. PubMed ID: 11273712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.
    Schmidt T; Haas J; Gallo Cassarino T; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):126-36. PubMed ID: 21987472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in sequences and 3D structures by random forests.
    Sikić M; Tomić S; Vlahovicek K
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jan; 5(1):e1000278. PubMed ID: 19180183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. firestar--prediction of functionally important residues using structural templates and alignment reliability.
    López G; Valencia A; Tress ML
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W573-7. PubMed ID: 17584799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SH3-SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family.
    Brannetti B; Via A; Cestra G; Cesareni G; Helmer-Citterich M
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 298(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 10764600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ligand-target prediction by structural network biology using nAnnoLyze.
    Martínez-Jiménez F; Marti-Renom MA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004157. PubMed ID: 25816344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.