These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31862146)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of 1-piece versus 2-piece implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Lemos CAA; de Luna Gomes JM; Minatel L; Alves Rezende MCR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):439-445. PubMed ID: 31862146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 26589441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of external and internal implant-abutment connections for implant supported prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Bonfante EA; Santiago Júnior JF; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():14-22. PubMed ID: 29221955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical effect of the high insertion torque on dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; de Oliveira Neto OB; Cruz RS; Luna Gomes JM; da Silva Casado BG; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):490-496. PubMed ID: 32917400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal number of implants for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses with a follow-up of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Luna Gomes JM; Lemos CAA; Santiago Junior JF; de Moraes SLD; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):766-774.e3. PubMed ID: 30527569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    de Medeiros FCFL; Kudo GAH; Leme BG; Saraiva PP; Verri FR; Honório HM; Pellizzer EP; Santiago Junior JF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 47(4):480-491. PubMed ID: 28651805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do dental implants placed in patients with osteoporosis have higher risks of failure and marginal bone loss compared to those in healthy patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Lemos CAA; de Oliveira AS; Faé DS; Oliveira HFFE; Del Rei Daltro Rosa CD; Bento VAA; Verri FR; Pellizzer EP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2483-2493. PubMed ID: 37043030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Atieh MA; Ibrahim HM; Atieh AH
    J Periodontol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):1350-66. PubMed ID: 20575657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review.
    Amine M; Guelzim Y; Benfaida S; Bennani A; Andoh A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 120(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30472460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between computer-guided and freehand dental implant placement surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yogui FC; Verri FR; de Luna Gomes JM; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Feb; 50(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 32921557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Implant Number on Mandibular Implant-Supported Profile Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
    Lima LB; de Freitas NR; Novais VR; Simamoto Júnior PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):795-807. PubMed ID: 30024995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alrabiah M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Rees J; Karasoulos D; Felice P; Alissa R; Worthington H; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 20467595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcome of zirconia implant-restoration complex.
    Haro Adánez M; Nishihara H; Att W
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Oct; 62(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 29983377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pigozzo MN; Rebelo da Costa T; Sesma N; Laganá DC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 29703670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Batista VES; Yogui FC; Oliveira HFF; Verri FR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 50(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 33158693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis.
    Roehling S; Schlegel KA; Woelfler H; Gahlert M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():135-153. PubMed ID: 30328200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.