These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3186228)

  • 21. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Nov; 67(803):1041-9. PubMed ID: 7820393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical recommendations for the use of D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Halse A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 3066808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Horner K; Hirschmann PN
    J Dent; 1990 Aug; 18(4):171-84. PubMed ID: 2212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vivo evaluation of the diagnostic quality ultra-speed versus insight intraoral dental film.
    Schiff T; Solomon BE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):50-7. PubMed ID: 15558090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Erbium filtration: a cost-effective, dose-reducing filter which maintains abdominal image quality.
    Doyle CA; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1923-5. PubMed ID: 10602978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of a samarium compound filter and E-speed film.
    Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Mann GB
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):769-73. PubMed ID: 9161270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tissue radiation dosages using the RVG-S with and without niobium filtration.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Brand JW; Kelly MS
    Aust Dent J; 1997 Oct; 42(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 9409051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of kilovoltage and filtration on dental radiographic film sensitivity.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 6950348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reduction in radiation dose for intra-oral radiographs by the use of thin K-edge filters.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):524-8. PubMed ID: 2070183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How good is the erbium filter?
    Howard C
    Radiogr Today; 1991 Jun; 57(649):22-6. PubMed ID: 1910517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Behrman RH
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.