These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3186384)

  • 1. Pediatric defibrillation: importance of paddle size in determining transthoracic impedance.
    Atkins DL; Sirna S; Kieso R; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1988 Dec; 82(6):914-8. PubMed ID: 3186384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External defibrillation in the left lateral position--a comparison of manual paddles with self-adhesive pads.
    Dodd TE; Deakin CD; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2004 Dec; 63(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 15582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is optimal paddle force applied during paediatric external defibrillation?
    Bennetts SH; Deakin CD; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2004 Jan; 60(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 14987780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is the optimal paddle force during paediatric external defibrillation?
    Deakin CD; Bennetts SH; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2003 Oct; 59(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 14580737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential contribution of skin impedance and thoracic volume to transthoracic impedance during external defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Sado DM; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Resuscitation; 2004 Feb; 60(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 15036735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low energy biphasic waveform cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias in pediatric patients and young adults.
    Liberman L; Hordof AJ; Altmann K; Pass RH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Dec; 29(12):1383-6. PubMed ID: 17201846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of sternotomy on chest impedance.
    Kerber RE; Vance S; Schomer SJ; Mariano DJ; Charbonnier F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 20(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 1607545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.
    Kerber RE; Grayzel J; Hoyt R; Marcus M; Kennedy J
    Circulation; 1981 Mar; 63(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 7460251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of transthoracic impedance using standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibrillation pads.
    Deakin CD; McLaren RM; Petley GW; Clewlow F; Dalrymple-Hay MJ
    Resuscitation; 1998; 39(1-2):43-6. PubMed ID: 9918446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining transthoracic impedance, delivered energy, and peak current during defibrillation episodes.
    Jones VC; Charbonnier FM; Long P
    Med Instrum; 1981; 15(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 7339468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of paddle placement and size on defibrillation current distribution: a three-dimensional finite element model.
    Karlon WJ; Eisenberg SR; Lehr JL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 8335328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transthoracic defibrillation: does electrode adhesive pad position alter transthoracic impedance?
    Garcia LA; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 1998 Jun; 37(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 9715772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.
    White RD; Blackwell TH; Russell JK; Snyder DE; Jorgenson DB
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jan; 64(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15629557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.