262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31864818)
1. A Comparison of Open-Construct PEEK Suture Anchor and Non-Vented Biocomposite Suture Anchor in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
Kim JH; Kim YS; Park I; Lee HJ; Han SY; Jung S; Shin SJ
Arthroscopy; 2020 Feb; 36(2):389-396. PubMed ID: 31864818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perianchor Cyst Formation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using All-Suture-Type, Bioabsorbable-Type, and PEEK-Type Anchors.
Ro K; Pancholi S; Son HS; Rhee YG
Arthroscopy; 2019 Aug; 35(8):2284-2292. PubMed ID: 31350085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Short-term safety and effectiveness of domestic polyether-ether-ketone suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled noninferiority study].
Li Y; Xu Y; Xu L; Li T; Li R; Tang X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 36382449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bony Ingrowth of Coil-Type Open-Architecture Anchors Compared With Screw-Type PEEK Anchors for the Medial Row in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chahla J; Liu JN; Manderle B; Beletsky A; Cabarcas B; Gowd AK; Inoue N; Chubinskaya S; Trenhaile S; Forsythe B; Cole B; Verma N
Arthroscopy; 2020 Apr; 36(4):952-961. PubMed ID: 31805386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A non-inferiority comparison of Delta Medical's PEEK Suture Anchor and Smith & Nephew's PEEK Suture Anchor in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
Gao P; Wang H; Xu Y; Li Y; Cai G; Wu Y; Huang Z; Li Q; Wang J
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Dec; 9(24):1767. PubMed ID: 35071461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The formation of perianchor fluid associated with various suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair: all-suture, polyetheretherketone, and biocomposite anchors.
Kim SH; Yang SH; Rhee SM; Lee KJ; Kim HS; Oh JH
Bone Joint J; 2019 Dec; 101-B(12):1506-1511. PubMed ID: 31786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative bone marrow edema lasts no more than 6 months after uncomplicated arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with PEEK anchors.
Chen S; He Y; Wu D; Hu N; Liang X; Jiang D; Huang W; Chen H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jan; 29(1):162-169. PubMed ID: 32055881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-Suture Anchor Settling After Arthroscopic Repair of Small and Medium Rotator Cuff Tears.
Ro K; Rhee SM; Kim JY; Kim MS; Kim JD; Lee H; Rhee YG
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3483-3490. PubMed ID: 31718248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protocol for a Retrospective Comparative Study to Determine the Effect of Two Different Biocomposite Suture Anchors on the Occurrence of Bony Ingrowth and Implant Reabsorption Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
Thangarajah T; Tsuchiya S; Lo IK
Int J Surg Protoc; 2021; 25(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 34395961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors: a midterm magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of repair integrity and cyst formation.
Van der Bracht H; Van den Langenbergh T; Pouillon M; Verhasselt S; Verniers P; Stoffelen D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2006-2012. PubMed ID: 29802062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of open architecture anchors in biocomposite material: medium term clinical and MRI evaluation. Our experience.
Di Benedetto P; Lassandro N; Beltrame A; Mancuso F; Giardini P; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2020 May; 91(4-S):189-195. PubMed ID: 32555096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the arthroscopic modified tension band suture technique suitable for all full-thickness rotator cuff tears?
Bae KH; Kim JW; Kim TK; Kweon SH; Kang HJ; Kim JY; Joo MS; Kim DM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Sep; 25(9):1457-63. PubMed ID: 27017412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial Commentary: Taking a "PEEK" at Suture Anchor Composition following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Is Bio Really Better?
Scholten DJ; Waterman BR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Feb; 36(2):397-399. PubMed ID: 32014172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear.
Lee HI; Shon MS; Koh KH; Lim TK; Heo J; Yoo JC
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Mar; 23(3):e53-60. PubMed ID: 24021158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in Perianchor Cyst Formation Over Time After Rotator Cuff Repair: Influential Factors and Outcomes.
Chung SW; Lee YS; Kim JY; Lee JH; Ki SY; Oh KS; Yoon JP; Kim JY
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 30485118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Combined Use of Biocomposite and PEEK Suture Anchors during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Observational Study.
Lee JH; Lee YB
J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 32781633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Knotless Suture Bridge Technique: Functional and Radiological Outcomes After a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.
Dukan R; Ledinot P; Donadio J; Boyer P
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jul; 35(7):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 31147110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears Showed Lower Short-term Retear Rates After Arthroscopic Double-Layer Repair Versus Bursal Layer-Only Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Heuberer PR; Pauzenberger L; Gruber MS; Ostermann RC; Hexel M; Laky B; Anderl W
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):689-696. PubMed ID: 31917608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: suture-bridge versus double-row modified Mason-Allen technique.
Lee KW; Yang DS; Lee GS; Ma CH; Choy WS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1953-1959. PubMed ID: 29803504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incomplete articular-side repair increase re-tear rate in full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
Kim KC; Lee WY; Shin HD; Han SC
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(1):2309499018760113. PubMed ID: 29486671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
