181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31865845)
1. Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations.
Rhudy MB; Dreisbach SB; Moran MD; Ruggiero MJ; Veerabhadrappa P
J Sports Sci; 2020 Mar; 38(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 31865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE
J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children.
Phillips LR; Parfitt G; Rowlands AV
J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Montoye AHK
J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using accelerometry to classify physical activity intensity in older adults: What is the optimal wear-site?
Duncan MJ; Rowlands A; Lawson C; Leddington Wright S; Hill M; Morris M; Eyre E; Tallis J
Eur J Sport Sci; 2020 Sep; 20(8):1131-1139. PubMed ID: 31726952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of raw acceleration cut-points for wrist and hip accelerometers to assess sedentary behaviour and physical activity in 5-7-year-old children.
Crotti M; Foweather L; Rudd JR; Hurter L; Schwarz S; Boddy LM
J Sports Sci; 2020 May; 38(9):1036-1045. PubMed ID: 32228156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children.
Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration and Cross-Validation of the ActiGraph wGT3X+ Accelerometer for the Estimation of Physical Activity Intensity in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.
McGarty AM; Penpraze V; Melville CA
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164928. PubMed ID: 27760219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity classification accuracy of accelerometer-measured physical activities in Chinese children and youth.
Zhu Z; Chen P; Zhuang J
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2013 Dec; 84 Suppl 2():S4-11. PubMed ID: 24527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
Lee P; Tse CY
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrist Accelerometry for Physical Activity Measurement in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Need for Individually Calibrated Cut-Points.
McCracken LA; Ma JK; Voss C; Chan FH; Martin Ginis KA; West CR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Apr; 99(4):684-689. PubMed ID: 29222006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous validation of five activity monitors for use in adult populations.
Powell C; Carson BP; Dowd KP; Donnelly AE
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1881-1892. PubMed ID: 27905148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.
Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Indirect Calorimetry- and Accelerometry-Based Energy Expenditure During Children's Discrete Skill Performance.
Sacko R; McIver K; Brazendale K; Pfeifer C; Brian A; Nesbitt D; Stodden DF
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Dec; 90(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 31441713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old.
Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-validation of Actigraph derived accelerometer cut-points for assessment of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in children aged 8-11 years.
Duncan MJ; Eyre ELJ; Cox V; Roscoe CMP; Faghy MA; Tallis J; Dobell A
Acta Paediatr; 2020 Sep; 109(9):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 31984545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A validation study of the use of smartphones and wrist-worn ActiGraphs to measure physical activity at different levels of intensity and step rates in older people.
Kwan RYC; Liu JYW; Lee D; Tse CYA; Lee PH
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():306-312. PubMed ID: 33007688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study.
Bammann K; Thomson NK; Albrecht BM; Buchan DS; Easton C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252615. PubMed ID: 34081715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wrist Accelerometer Cut Points for Classifying Sedentary Behavior in Children.
VAN Loo CM; Okely AD; Batterham MJ; Hinkley T; Ekelund U; Brage S; Reilly JJ; Trost SG; Jones RA; Janssen X; Cliff DP
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Apr; 49(4):813-822. PubMed ID: 27851669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
