These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31865909)

  • 1. Parameter, noise, and tree topology effects in tumor phylogeny inference.
    Tomlinson K; Oesper L
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 10):184. PubMed ID: 31865909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PhISCS: a combinatorial approach for subperfect tumor phylogeny reconstruction via integrative use of single-cell and bulk sequencing data.
    Malikic S; Mehrabadi FR; Ciccolella S; Rahman MK; Ricketts C; Haghshenas E; Seidman D; Hach F; Hajirasouliha I; Sahinalp SC
    Genome Res; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1860-1877. PubMed ID: 31628256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring clonal evolution of tumors from single nucleotide somatic mutations.
    Jiao W; Vembu S; Deshwar AG; Stein L; Morris Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 15():35. PubMed ID: 24484323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PhyDOSE: Design of follow-up single-cell sequencing experiments of tumors.
    Weber LL; Aguse N; Chia N; El-Kebir M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Oct; 16(10):e1008240. PubMed ID: 33001973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CALDER: Inferring Phylogenetic Trees from Longitudinal Tumor Samples.
    Myers MA; Satas G; Raphael BJ
    Cell Syst; 2019 Jun; 8(6):514-522.e5. PubMed ID: 31229560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrative inference of subclonal tumour evolution from single-cell and bulk sequencing data.
    Malikic S; Jahn K; Kuipers J; Sahinalp SC; Beerenwinkel N
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2750. PubMed ID: 31227714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Methods for Analysis of Tumor Clonality and Evolutionary History.
    Goh G; McGranahan N; Wilson GA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1878():217-226. PubMed ID: 30378079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference-free inference of tumor phylogenies from single-cell sequencing data.
    Subramanian A; Schwartz R
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S7. PubMed ID: 26576947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SCARLET: Single-cell tumor phylogeny inference with copy-number constrained mutation losses.
    Satas G; Zaccaria S; Mon G; Raphael BJ
    Cell Syst; 2020 Apr; 10(4):323-332.e8. PubMed ID: 32864481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BAMSE: Bayesian model selection for tumor phylogeny inference among multiple samples.
    Toosi H; Moeini A; Hajirasouliha I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 11):282. PubMed ID: 31167637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing intratumor heterogeneity and tracking longitudinal and spatial clonal evolutionary history by next-generation sequencing.
    Jiang Y; Qiu Y; Minn AJ; Zhang NR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Sep; 113(37):E5528-37. PubMed ID: 27573852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CONIPHER: a computational framework for scalable phylogenetic reconstruction with error correction.
    Grigoriadis K; Huebner A; Bunkum A; Colliver E; Frankell AM; Hill MS; Thol K; Birkbak NJ; Swanton C; Zaccaria S; McGranahan N
    Nat Protoc; 2024 Jan; 19(1):159-183. PubMed ID: 38017136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumor phylogeny inference using tree-constrained importance sampling.
    Satas G; Raphael BJ
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):i152-i160. PubMed ID: 28882002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Relaxing the Infinite Sites Assumption Give Better Tumor Phylogenies? An ILP-Based Comparative Approach.
    Bonizzoni P; Ciccolella S; Vedova GD; Soto M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1410-1423. PubMed ID: 31603766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A configuration space of homologous proteins conserving mutual information and allowing a phylogeny inference based on pair-wise Z-score probabilities.
    Bastien O; Ortet P; Roy S; Maréchal E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():49. PubMed ID: 15757521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNV-PPILP: refined SNV calling for tumor data using perfect phylogenies and ILP.
    van Rens KE; Mäkinen V; Tomescu AI
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 31(7):1133-5. PubMed ID: 25398608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ConDoR: tumor phylogeny inference with a copy-number constrained mutation loss model.
    Sashittal P; Zhang H; Iacobuzio-Donahue CA; Raphael BJ
    Genome Biol; 2023 Nov; 24(1):272. PubMed ID: 38037115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing.
    Niknafs N; Beleva-Guthrie V; Naiman DQ; Karchin R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004416. PubMed ID: 26436540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting for sequencing error in maximum likelihood phylogeny inference.
    Kuhner MK; McGill J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Nov; 4(12):2545-52. PubMed ID: 25378476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.