228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31866480)
1. Long-Term Outcomes of Mosaic Versus Perimount Mitral Replacements: 17-Year Follow-Up of 940 Implants.
Beute TJ; Goehler M; Parker J; Boeve T; Heiser J; Murphy E; Timek T; Willekes CL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 110(2):508-515. PubMed ID: 31866480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of early redo surgery rates in Mosaic porcine and Perimount bovine pericardial valves.
Webb J; Parkin D; Tøndel K; Simitsis P; Roxburgh J; Chambers JB
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 54(4):724-728. PubMed ID: 29579171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations.
Bourguignon T; Bouquiaux-Stablo AL; Loardi C; Mirza A; Candolfi P; Marchand M; Aupart MR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):2004-2011.e1. PubMed ID: 24667021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.
Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Pericardial Bioprosthesis in Chinese Patients with Single or Multiple Valve Replacement in Aortic, Mitral, or Tricuspid Positions.
Guo H; Lu C; Huang H; Xie B; Liu J; Zheng S; Fan R; Chen J; Zhuang J
Cardiology; 2017; 138(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 28618423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation.
Blauwet LA; Malouf JF; Connolly HM; Hodge DO; Evans KN; Herges RM; Sundt TM; Miller FA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Jun; 23(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 20497863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to ten years.
Riess FC; Bader R; Cramer E; Hansen L; Kleijnen B; Wahl G; Wallrath J; Winkel S; Bleese N
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr; 83(4):1310-8. PubMed ID: 17383332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valves: results from a Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.
Kim HR; Park J; Park SJ; Kim HJ; Kim S; Kim YJ; Ahn JM; Kim DH; Kim JB
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Jun; 63(6):. PubMed ID: 37115646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic performance and clinical outcome of pericardial Perimount Magna and Porcine Hancock-II valves in aortic position.
Caporali E; Bonato R; Klersy C; Ferrari E
J Card Surg; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 31389647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies.
Malvindi PG; Mastro F; Kowalewski M; Ringold M; Margari V; Suwalski P; Speziale G; Paparella D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Feb; 109(2):603-611. PubMed ID: 31472130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.
Rokui S; Gottschalk B; Peng D; Groenewoud R; Ye J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jul; 66(1):. PubMed ID: 38936344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
