These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31867689)

  • 1. Quality of evidence matters: is it well reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
    Glujovsky D; Sueldo CE; Bardach A; Del Pilar Valanzasca M; Comandé D; Ciapponi A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Feb; 37(2):263-268. PubMed ID: 31867689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?
    Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing the right journal for your systematic review.
    Betini M; Volpato ES; Anastácio GD; de Faria RT; El Dib R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):834-6. PubMed ID: 25039685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.
    Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Innes NP
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):548-560. PubMed ID: 30070003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of research quality in major infertility journals.
    Glujovsky D; Riestra B; Coscia A; Boggino C; Comandé D; Ciapponi A
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1539-43. PubMed ID: 22981173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misleading reporting and interpretation of results in major infertility journals.
    Glujovsky D; Sueldo CE; Borghi C; Nicotra P; Andreucci S; Ciapponi A
    Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 26794424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
    Krnic Martinic M; Meerpohl JJ; von Elm E; Herrle F; Marusic A; Puljak L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029704. PubMed ID: 31471441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of GRADE in evidence syntheses published in high-impact-factor nutrition journals: A methodological survey.
    Werner SS; Binder N; Toews I; Schünemann HJ; Meerpohl JJ; Schwingshackl L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 135():54-69. PubMed ID: 33588024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.