These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31867689)

  • 81. Journal impact factor and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: an empirical study.
    Ahmed Ali U; Reiber BMM; Ten Hove JR; van der Sluis PC; Gooszen HG; Boermeester MA; Besselink MG
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Nov; 402(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28578503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Studies with statistically significant effect estimates are more frequently published compared to non-significant estimates in oral health journals.
    Seehra J; Khraishi H; Pandis N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):6. PubMed ID: 36624365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The N-pact factor: evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power.
    Fraley RC; Vazire S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109019. PubMed ID: 25296159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Listening Effort Informed Quality of Experience Evaluation.
    Sun PW; Hines A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():767840. PubMed ID: 35069342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. QoE Optimization in a Live Cellular Network through RLC Parameter Tuning.
    Mendoza J; de-la-Bandera I; Palacios D; Barco R
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34451060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Dimensionality reduction of independent influence factors in the objective evaluation of quality of experience.
    Skaka-Čekić F; Baraković Husić J; Odžak A; Hadžialić M; Huremović A; Šehić K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10320. PubMed ID: 35725598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Subjective and Objective Quality of Experience of Free Viewpoint Videos.
    Yan J; Li J; Fang Y; Che Z; Xia X; Liu Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3896-3907. PubMed ID: 35622787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. JSFA Reports: Improving our service to authors.
    Shepherd M; Waterhouse A
    J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Dec; 101(15):6155. PubMed ID: 34125963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Quality of evidence matters: is it well reported and interpreted in infertility journals?
    Glujovsky D; Sueldo CE; Bardach A; Del Pilar Valanzasca M; Comandé D; Ciapponi A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Feb; 37(2):263-268. PubMed ID: 31867689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?
    Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Choosing the right journal for your systematic review.
    Betini M; Volpato ES; Anastácio GD; de Faria RT; El Dib R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):834-6. PubMed ID: 25039685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.
    Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Innes NP
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):548-560. PubMed ID: 30070003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Scientists rise up against statistical significance.
    Amrhein V; Greenland S; McShane B
    Nature; 2019 Mar; 567(7748):305-307. PubMed ID: 30894741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    McGrath TA; McInnes MDF; van Es N; Leeflang MMG; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM
    Clin Chem; 2017 Aug; 63(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 28606911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.