These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31868162)
1. Perspectives on Correctness in Probabilistic Inference from Psychology. Pothos EM; Basieva I; Khrennikov A; Yearsley JM Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E55. PubMed ID: 31868162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primer on quantum cognition. Busemeyer JR; Wang Z Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E53. PubMed ID: 31868156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making? Wojciechowski BW; Pothos EM Front Psychol; 2018; 9():391. PubMed ID: 29674983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ranking Theory and Conditional Reasoning. Skovgaard-Olsen N Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):848-80. PubMed ID: 26213239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments. Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A quantum probability framework for human probabilistic inference. Trueblood JS; Yearsley JM; Pothos EM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Sep; 146(9):1307-1341. PubMed ID: 28682091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychological 'double-slit experiment' in decision making: Quantum versus classical. Rashkovskiy S; Khrennikov A Biosystems; 2020 Jul; 195():104171. PubMed ID: 32485348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A quantum probability perspective on borderline vagueness. Blutner R; Pothos EM; Bruza P Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):711-36. PubMed ID: 24039093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why quantum probability does not explain the conjunction fallacy. Tentori K; Crupi V Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):308-10. PubMed ID: 23673055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Sperber D; Girotto V Cognition; 2002 Oct; 85(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 12169412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reasoning, decision making and rationality. Evans JS; Over DE; Manktelow KI Cognition; 1993; 49(1-2):165-87. PubMed ID: 8287673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantum modeling of common sense. Noori HR; Spanagel R Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):302. PubMed ID: 23673048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]