These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31869404)

  • 1. Feature selection for helpfulness prediction of online product reviews: An empirical study.
    Du J; Rong J; Michalska S; Wang H; Zhang Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226902. PubMed ID: 31869404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online reviews, customer Q&As, and product sales: A PVAR approach.
    Feng M; Feng Y; Li Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0290674. PubMed ID: 37976309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracting product features and opinion words using pattern knowledge in customer reviews.
    Htay SS; Lynn KT
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():394758. PubMed ID: 24459430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testosterone Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Testosterone Boosting Supplements.
    Balasubramanian A; Thirumavalavan N; Srivatsav A; Yu J; Lipshultz LI; Pastuszak AW
    J Sex Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):203-212. PubMed ID: 30770069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexicon-enhanced sentiment analysis framework using rule-based classification scheme.
    Asghar MZ; Khan A; Ahmad S; Qasim M; Khan IA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171649. PubMed ID: 28231286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What makes people read an online review? The relative effects of posting time and helpfulness on review readership.
    Lee J
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Jul; 16(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 23742150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diversifying customer review rankings.
    Krestel R; Dokoohaki N
    Neural Netw; 2015 Jun; 66():36-45. PubMed ID: 25795511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An improved deep forest model for prediction of e-commerce consumers' repurchase behavior.
    Zhang W; Wang M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0255906. PubMed ID: 34543319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online shopping green product quality supervision strategy with consumer feedback and collusion behavior.
    He H; Zhu L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229471. PubMed ID: 32126092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic Classification of Online Doctor Reviews: Evaluation of Text Classifier Algorithms.
    Rivas R; Montazeri N; Le NX; Hristidis V
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Nov; 20(11):e11141. PubMed ID: 30425030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient Feature Selection for Static Analysis Vulnerability Prediction.
    Filus K; Boryszko P; Domańska J; Siavvas M; Gelenbe E
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33561957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational Intelligence Based Recurrent Neural Network for Identification Deceptive Review in the E-Commerce Domain.
    Alsubari SN; Aldhyani THH; Deshmukh SN; Maashi M; Alharbi S; Al-Baity HH
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4656846. PubMed ID: 36438685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Your reviews or mine? Exploring the determinants of "perceived helpfulness" of online reviews: a cross-cultural study.
    Biswas B; Sengupta P; Ganguly B
    Electron Mark; 2022; 32(3):1083-1102. PubMed ID: 35602112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mining online e-liquid reviews for opinion polarities about e-liquid features.
    Chen Z; Zeng DD
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):633. PubMed ID: 28683797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature selection environment for genomic applications.
    Lopes FM; Martins DC; Cesar RM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():451. PubMed ID: 18945362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining Review Text Content and Reviewer-Item Rating Matrix to Predict Review Rating.
    Wang B; Huang Y; Li X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():5968705. PubMed ID: 26880879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factorization machines and deep views-based co-training for improving answer quality prediction in online health expert question-answering services.
    Zhang Z; Hu Z; Yang H; Zhu R; Zuo D
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():21-36. PubMed ID: 30240803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What makes clinical documents helpful and engaging? An empirical investigation of experience sharing in an online medical community.
    Wang P; Zhou L; Mu D; Zhang D; Shao Q
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104273. PubMed ID: 32979649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.