BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870118)

  • 1. Forgone Health and Economic Benefits Associated with Socioeconomic Differences in Organized Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Hsieh VC; Chen ZJ; Liu CC; Chiang JH; Shieh SH; Hsieh MS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Dec; 20(12):3755-3762. PubMed ID: 31870118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Jordan among Women from Different Socioeconomic Strata: Analysis of the 2012 Population-Based Household Survey.
    Al Rifai R; Nakamura K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6697-704. PubMed ID: 26434897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sociodemographic factors of Pap smear screening in Taiwan.
    Wang PD; Lin RS
    Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8901257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.
    Willems B; Bracke P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 30514273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inequalities in Pap smear screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.
    Martínez-Mesa J; Werutsky G; Campani RB; Wehrmeister FC; Barrios CH
    Prev Med; 2013 Oct; 57(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 23827721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.
    Lea CS; Perez-Heydrich C; Des Marais AC; Richman AR; Barclay L; Brewer NT; Smith JS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Aug; 28(8):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 30874477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
    Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.
    Paulauskiene J; Stelemekas M; Ivanauskiene R; Petkeviciene J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey.
    Petrelli A; Giorgi Rossi P; Francovich L; Giordani B; Di Napoli A; Zappa M; Mirisola C; Gargiulo L
    BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021653. PubMed ID: 30232106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with high-risk human papillomavirus test utilization and infection: a population-based study of uninsured and underinsured women.
    Llanos AAM; Tsui J; Rotter D; Toler L; Stroup AM
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):162. PubMed ID: 30285820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Prevalence and Associated Factors among Women in the South African General Population.
    Phaswana-Mafuya N; Peltzer K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Jun; 19(6):1465-1470. PubMed ID: 29936716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low Coverage and Disparities of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Thai Women: Analysis of National Representative Household Surveys.
    Mukem S; Meng Q; Sriplung H; Tangcharoensathien V
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8541-51. PubMed ID: 26745114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
    Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of cancer screening awareness and participation among Indonesian women.
    Anwar SL; Tampubolon G; Van Hemelrijck M; Hutajulu SH; Watkins J; Wulaningsih W;
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):208. PubMed ID: 29506486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical cancer screening and subsequent procedures in women under the age of 25 years between 2007 and 2013 in France: a nationwide French healthcare database study.
    Maura G; Chaignot C; Weill A; Alla F; Heard I
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 28368950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.
    Olesen SC; Butterworth P; Jacomb P; Tait RJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():34. PubMed ID: 22333392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Reform, Medicaid Expansions, and Women's Cancer Screening.
    Ku L; Bysshe T; Steinmetz E; Bruen BK
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 26926159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
    Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
    Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.