145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870118)
1. Forgone Health and Economic Benefits Associated with Socioeconomic Differences in Organized Cervical Cancer Screening.
Hsieh VC; Chen ZJ; Liu CC; Chiang JH; Shieh SH; Hsieh MS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Dec; 20(12):3755-3762. PubMed ID: 31870118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Jordan among Women from Different Socioeconomic Strata: Analysis of the 2012 Population-Based Household Survey.
Al Rifai R; Nakamura K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6697-704. PubMed ID: 26434897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sociodemographic factors of Pap smear screening in Taiwan.
Wang PD; Lin RS
Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8901257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia.
Willems B; Bracke P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 30514273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inequalities in Pap smear screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.
Martínez-Mesa J; Werutsky G; Campani RB; Wehrmeister FC; Barrios CH
Prev Med; 2013 Oct; 57(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 23827721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.
Lea CS; Perez-Heydrich C; Des Marais AC; Richman AR; Barclay L; Brewer NT; Smith JS
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Aug; 28(8):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 30874477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Stelemekas M; Ivanauskiene R; Petkeviciene J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geographical and socioeconomic differences in uptake of Pap test and mammography in Italy: results from the National Health Interview Survey.
Petrelli A; Giorgi Rossi P; Francovich L; Giordani B; Di Napoli A; Zappa M; Mirisola C; Gargiulo L
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021653. PubMed ID: 30232106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with high-risk human papillomavirus test utilization and infection: a population-based study of uninsured and underinsured women.
Llanos AAM; Tsui J; Rotter D; Toler L; Stroup AM
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Oct; 18(1):162. PubMed ID: 30285820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Prevalence and Associated Factors among Women in the South African General Population.
Phaswana-Mafuya N; Peltzer K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Jun; 19(6):1465-1470. PubMed ID: 29936716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low Coverage and Disparities of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Thai Women: Analysis of National Representative Household Surveys.
Mukem S; Meng Q; Sriplung H; Tangcharoensathien V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8541-51. PubMed ID: 26745114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of cancer screening awareness and participation among Indonesian women.
Anwar SL; Tampubolon G; Van Hemelrijck M; Hutajulu SH; Watkins J; Wulaningsih W;
BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):208. PubMed ID: 29506486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening and subsequent procedures in women under the age of 25 years between 2007 and 2013 in France: a nationwide French healthcare database study.
Maura G; Chaignot C; Weill A; Alla F; Heard I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 28368950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.
Olesen SC; Butterworth P; Jacomb P; Tait RJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():34. PubMed ID: 22333392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health Reform, Medicaid Expansions, and Women's Cancer Screening.
Ku L; Bysshe T; Steinmetz E; Bruen BK
Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 26926159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]