319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870347)
1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.
Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J
BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-position robot-assisted versus laparoscopic antegrade bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A retrospective controlled study.
Ji A; Lyu J; Bai Y; Jiang J; Liu F
Asian J Surg; 2022 Aug; 45(8):1530-1534. PubMed ID: 35339347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Singh A; Jaipuria J; Goel A; Shah S; Bhardwaj R; Baidya S; Jain J; Jain C; Rawal S
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 29307685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy vs Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma Penis: Expanding Role and Comparison of Outcomes.
Yadav SS; Tomar V; Bhattar R; Jha AK; Priyadarshi S
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():79-84. PubMed ID: 29155185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Partial Penectomy With Bilateral Robotic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Using Near-infrared Fluorescence Guidance.
Sávio LF; Panizzutti Barboza M; Alameddine M; Ahdoot M; Alonzo D; Ritch CR
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():251. PubMed ID: 29191642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
Patel AS; Isharwal S
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.
Sánchez A; Sotelo R; Rodriguez O; Sánchez R; Rosciano J; Medina L; Vegas L
J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):369-372. PubMed ID: 27173971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Through a Hypogastric vs Leg Subcutaneous Approach for Penile Cancer.
Yuan P; Zhao C; Liu Z; Ou Z; He W; Cai Y; Wang Y; Zu X; Qi L; Wang L
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 29256632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: Evolution of the Technique.
Stepanian S; Patel M; Porter J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):661-667. PubMed ID: 27068395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase 1 prospective evaluation of the oncological adequacy of robotic assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile carcinoma.
Matin SF; Cormier JN; Ward JF; Pisters LL; Wood CG; Dinney CP; Royal RE; Huang X; Pettaway CA
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1068-74. PubMed ID: 23551693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
Yang M; Liu Z; Tan Q; Hu X; Liu Y; Wei L; Deng C; Zhou S; Yang N; Duan G; Zheng Y; Li X; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Zheng J
BMC Surg; 2023 Mar; 23(1):55. PubMed ID: 36915083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel KN; Salunke A; Bakshi G; Jayaprakash D; Pandya SJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e11-112.e22. PubMed ID: 34895995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extending boundaries in minimally invasive procedures with simultaneous bilateral video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (veil) for penile cancer: initial Denver health medical center and ABC school of medicine experience and surgical considerations.
Pompeo A; Tobias-Machado M; Molina WR; Lucio J; Sehrt D; Pompeo AC; Kim FJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 24054388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using Near-infrared Fluorescence in Vulvar Cancer.
Mohammad A; Hunter MI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):968-972. PubMed ID: 30959199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
