200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870403)
1. Prediction of VMAT delivery accuracy with textural features calculated from fluence maps.
Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):235. PubMed ID: 31870403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulation indices and plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):12-22. PubMed ID: 31038843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Texture analysis on the edge-enhanced fluence of VMAT.
Park SY; Park JM; Sung W; Kim IH; Ye SJ
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():74. PubMed ID: 25890104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the plan delivery accuracy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy by texture analysis using fluence maps.
Park SY; Kim JI; Hoon Oh D; Park JM
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():64-74. PubMed ID: 30928067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the modulation degrees of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.
Park SY; Kim JI; Chun M; Ahn H; Park JM
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):244. PubMed ID: 30545396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of the gamma index analysis as a verification method of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.
Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY; Oh DH; Kim ST
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Sep; 13(1):175. PubMed ID: 30217163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Textural feature calculated from segmental fluences as a modulation index for VMAT.
Park SY; Park JM; Kim JI; Kim H; Kim IH; Ye SJ
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):981-990. PubMed ID: 26392169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation.
Hirashima H; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Mukumoto N; Ono T; Iramina H; Mizowaki T
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 14(1):62. PubMed ID: 30971273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analyses of integrated EPID images for on-treatment quality assurance to account for interfractional variations in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Matsushita N; Nakamura M; Sasaki M; Yano S; Yoshimura M; Mizowaki T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):110-116. PubMed ID: 31909889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of the gamma passing rates with the differences in the dose-volumetric parameters between the original VMAT plans and actual deliveries of the VMAT plans.
Park JM; Choi CH; Wu HG; Kim JI
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244690. PubMed ID: 33373394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT.
Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Carlson JN; Kim K
Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140698. PubMed ID: 25734490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation index for VMAT considering both mechanical and dose calculation uncertainties.
Park JM; Park SY; Kim H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7101-25. PubMed ID: 26317697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Huang L; Zhuang T; Mastroianni A; Djemil T; Cui T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27167278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gamma-index method sensitivity for gauging plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park JI; Park JM; Kim JI; Park SY; Ye SJ
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1118-1122. PubMed ID: 26422199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.
Lin X; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang G; Yin Y
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35842671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
