These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870427)

  • 1. Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):758. PubMed ID: 31870427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).
    van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van der Horst S; Verhage RJ; Besselink MG; Prins MJ; Haverkamp L; Schippers C; Rinkes IH; Joore HC; Ten Kate FJ; Koffijberg H; Kroese CC; van Leeuwen MS; Lolkema MP; Reerink O; Schipper ME; Steenhagen E; Vleggaar FP; Voest EE; Siersema PD; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2012 Nov; 13():230. PubMed ID: 23199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
    van Rossum PSN; Haverkamp L; Carvello M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management and outcomes of anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer.
    Duan X; Bai W; Ma Z; Yue J; Shang X; Jiang H; Yu Z
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():304-309. PubMed ID: 32891347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A single blinded randomized controlled trial comparing semi-mechanical with hand-sewn cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer (SHARE-study).
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; de Vringer T; van Lanschot JJB; Willemsen SP; Hop WCJ; Wijnhoven BPL
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(8):1616-1623. PubMed ID: 32989770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is Prophylactic Cervical Drainage Effective in Patients Undergoing McKeown Esophagectomy Reconstructed Through the Retrosternal Route with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy?
    Fujiwara D; Watanabe M; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Sakamoto K; Okamura A; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Mine S
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1944-1951. PubMed ID: 35445357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified layered hand-sewn cervical end-to-side anastomosis for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
    Cheng L; Fu S; Liu J; Wang Z; Fu M
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 124(7):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 34309871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
    Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
    Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial.
    van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with the sump drainage tube.
    Yin Q; Zhou S; Song Y; Xun X; Liu N; Liu L
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Mar; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 33757562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for early diagnosis and treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leakage: prophylactic placement of a drainage tube adjacent to the anastomosis.
    Tang H; Xue L; Hong J; Tao X; Xu Z; Wu B
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Apr; 16(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 22125174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Complications After Radical McKeown Esophagectomy.
    Jiang H; Hua R; Sun Y; Guo X; Liu Z; Su Y; Li B; Yang Y; Zhang H; Li Z
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Sep; 112(3):944-951. PubMed ID: 33144103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of cervical delta-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy.
    Huang C; Xu X; Zhuang B; Chen W; Xu X; Wang C; Lin S
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 15(1):31. PubMed ID: 28103879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
    Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of mediastinal drainage tube in intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leakage for early diagnosis and effective treatment: a retrospective study.
    Ma H; Song X; Li J; Zhao G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Mar; 16(1):52. PubMed ID: 33766053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.