These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870545)

  • 1. An exclusion approach for addressing partial volume artifacts with quantititive computed tomography-based finite element modeling of the proximal tibia.
    Kalajahi SMH; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():95-100. PubMed ID: 31870545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separate modeling of cortical and trabecular bone offers little improvement in FE predictions of local structural stiffness at the proximal tibia.
    Hosseini Kalajahi SM; Nazemi SM; Johnston JD
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1258-1268. PubMed ID: 31509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing finite element predictions of local subchondral bone structural stiffness using neural network-derived density-modulus relationships for proximal tibial subchondral cortical and trabecular bone.
    Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():1-8. PubMed ID: 27842233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of local proximal tibial subchondral bone structural stiffness using subject-specific finite element modeling: Effect of selected density-modulus relationship.
    Nazemi SM; Amini M; Kontulainen SA; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):703-12. PubMed ID: 26024555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for spatial variation of trabecular anisotropy with subject-specific finite element modeling moderately improves predictions of local subchondral bone stiffness at the proximal tibia.
    Nazemi SM; Kalajahi SMH; Cooper DML; Kontulainen SA; Holdsworth DW; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Johnston JD
    J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():101-108. PubMed ID: 28601243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QCT-FE modeling of the proximal tibia: Effect of mapping strategy on convergence time and model accuracy.
    Ashjaee N; Kalajahi SMH; Johnston JD
    Med Eng Phys; 2021 Feb; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 33485512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual and combined effects of OA-related subchondral bone alterations on proximal tibial surface stiffness: a parametric finite element modeling study.
    Amini M; Nazemi SM; Lanovaz JL; Kontulainen S; Masri BA; Wilson DR; Szyszkowski W; Johnston JD
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):783-91. PubMed ID: 26074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
    Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proximal Tibia Bone Stiffness and Strength in HR-pQCT- and QCT-Based Finite Element Models.
    Knowles NK; Whittier DE; Besler BA; Boyd SK
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Sep; 49(9):2389-2398. PubMed ID: 33977411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knee osteoarthritis patients with more subchondral cysts have altered tibial subchondral bone mineral density.
    Burnett WD; Kontulainen SA; McLennan CE; Hazel D; Talmo C; Wilson DR; Hunter DJ; Johnston JD
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 30611224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictive ability of a QCT-FE model of the proximal femoral stiffness under multiple load cases is strongly influenced by experimental uncertainties.
    Amini M; Reisinger A; Synek A; Hirtler L; Pahr D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Mar; 139():105664. PubMed ID: 36657193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Torsional stiffness and strength of the proximal tibia are better predicted by finite element models than DXA or QCT.
    Edwards WB; Schnitzer TJ; Troy KL
    J Biomech; 2013 Jun; 46(10):1655-62. PubMed ID: 23680350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Bone Fragility in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Using QCT-Based Finite Element Modeling.
    Campbell GM; Peña JA; Giravent S; Thomsen F; Damm T; Glüer CC; Borggrefe J
    J Bone Miner Res; 2017 Jan; 32(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 27454865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
    Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Administration of romosozumab improves vertebral trabecular and cortical bone as assessed with quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis.
    Graeff C; Campbell GM; Peña J; Borggrefe J; Padhi D; Kaufman A; Chang S; Libanati C; Glüer CC
    Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():364-369. PubMed ID: 26232375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.
    Dragomir-Daescu D; Salas C; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 25442008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of density-modulus relationships used in finite element modeling of the shoulder.
    Knowles NK; Langohr GDG; Faieghi M; Nelson AJ; Ferreira LM
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Apr; 66():40-46. PubMed ID: 30833224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
    Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.
    Crawford RP; Cann CE; Keaveny TM
    Bone; 2003 Oct; 33(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 14555280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.