852 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870582)
21. Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study.
Wang Q; Li D; Kang P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019857653. PubMed ID: 31232172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Monoblock Fluted Titanium-Tapered Stem for Paprosky IIIa, IIIb, and IV Femoral Bone Defects.
Passano B; Oakley CT; Lutes WB; Incavo SJ; Park KJ; Schwarzkopf R
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 36731584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.
Gabor JA; Padilla JA; Feng JE; Schnaser E; Lutes WB; Park KJ; Incavo S; Vigdorchik J; Schwarzkopf R
Bone Joint J; 2020 Feb; 102-B(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 32009430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Rastogi D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26013152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differences between proximal bone remodeling in femoral revisions for aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fractures using the Wagner SL stem.
Friebert G; Gombár C; Bozó A; Polyák I; Brzózka Á; Sisák K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):201. PubMed ID: 33596872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does the Periprosthetic Fracture Pattern Depend on the Stem Fixation Method in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Han KS; Kang SR; Yoon SJ
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 36778997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components.
Clair AJ; Gabor JA; Patel KS; Friedlander S; Deshmukh AJ; Schwarzkopf R
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S299-S303. PubMed ID: 32253066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Zheng K; Li N; Zhang W; Zhu Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Geng D
Orthop Surg; 2021 May; 13(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 33821565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence.
Yacovelli S; Ottaway J; Banerjee S; Courtney PM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32863074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High incidence of stem loosening in association with periprosthetic femur fractures in previously well-fixed cementless grit-blasted tapered-wedge stems.
Lim SJ; Lee KJ; Min BW; Song JH; So SY; Park YS
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1689-93. PubMed ID: 25385003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tapered fluted modular titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 peri-prosthetic fractures.
Munro JT; Masri BA; Garbuz DS; Duncan CP
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):17-20. PubMed ID: 24187345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stems in Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 87 consecutive revisions.
van Laarhoven SN; Vles GF; van Haaren EH; Schotanus MGM; van Hemert WLW
Hip Int; 2021 Jul; 31(4):555-561. PubMed ID: 32028802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Replacement: Our Results and Treatment Complications].
Pavelka T; Salášek M; Weisová D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 28253947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Revision of total hip arthroplasty by long locking stem with fully hydroxyapatite-coated modular metaphysis (Reef™): A continuous series of 78 cases at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
de Leissegues T; Viste A; Fessy MH
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103786. PubMed ID: 38070731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.
Abdel MP; Houdek MT; Watts CD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 27037428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mid-Term Results of Modular Tapered Femoral Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Marfo KA; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
Surg Technol Int; 2019 Nov; 35():295-300. PubMed ID: 31087320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hip revision arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis in periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 fractures using a cementless, modular, tapered revision stem.
Fink B; Oremek D
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):11-16. PubMed ID: 28363889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cortical Strut Allograft Support of Modular Femoral Junctions During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lim CT; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Hwang KL; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1586-1592. PubMed ID: 28130016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nonmodular Stems Are a Viable Alternative to Modular Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Clair AJ; Cizmic Z; Vigdorchik JM; Poultsides LA; Schwarzkopf R; Rathod PA; Deshmukh AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S292-S296. PubMed ID: 31010773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]