These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870612)

  • 1. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):575-580. PubMed ID: 31870612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Att W; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 33094878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Lighting Conditions on the Mesh Quality of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):651-655. PubMed ID: 32463965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans?
    Wesemann C; Kienbaum H; Thun M; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):924-931. PubMed ID: 32487348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy assessment (trueness and precision) of a confocal based intraoral scanner under twelve different ambient lighting conditions.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Adhikari RR; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR; Revilla-León M; Gallas-Torreira M
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104530. PubMed ID: 37116740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
    Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of color temperature and illuminance of ambient light conditions on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38014704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position.
    Kim RJ; Benic GI; Park JM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0222070. PubMed ID: 31743331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.
    Róth I; Czigola A; Fehér D; Vitai V; Joós-Kovács GL; Hermann P; Borbély J; Vecsei B
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 35473932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.