BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31870684)

  • 1. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of hemispheric dominance, literacy acquisition, and handedness on the development of visuospatial attention: A study in preschoolers and second graders.
    Rinaldi L; Di Luca S; Toneatto C; Girelli L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jul; 195():104830. PubMed ID: 32203730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.
    Leone L; McCourt ME
    Laterality; 2010 May; 15(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 19319748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection.
    Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Right hemisphere dominance directly predicts both baseline V1 cortical excitability and the degree of top-down modulation exerted over low-level brain structures.
    Arshad Q; Siddiqui S; Ramachandran S; Goga U; Bonsu A; Patel M; Roberts RE; Nigmatullina Y; Malhotra P; Bronstein AM
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():484-9. PubMed ID: 26518461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME; Shpaner M; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoneglect is maintained in aging but not in mild Alzheimer's disease: new insights from an enumeration task.
    Brignani D; Bagattini C; Mazza V
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():276-283. PubMed ID: 29428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of frontal-to-parietal connectivity in pseudoneglect: A cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation study.
    Guidali G; Bagattini C; De Matola M; Brignani D
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():50-64. PubMed ID: 37862830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
    Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA methylation of dopamine-related gene promoters is associated with line bisection deviation in healthy adults.
    Schmitz J; Kumsta R; Moser D; Güntürkün O; Ocklenburg S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5902. PubMed ID: 30976054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?
    Kitayama S; Fujikake H; Kokubu M; Higuchi T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 25432626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Grant A; Harvey M
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2014; 6():113. PubMed ID: 24959142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Are the Contributions of Handedness, Sighting Dominance, Hand Used to Bisect, and Visuospatial Line Processing to the Behavioral Line Bisection Bias?
    Ochando A; Zago L
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1688. PubMed ID: 30258382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?
    Ribolsi M; Di Lorenzo G; Lisi G; Niolu C; Siracusano A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25377236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of cognitive load on horizontal and vertical spatial asymmetries.
    Ciricugno A; Bartlett ML; Gwinn OS; Carragher DJ; Nicholls MER
    Laterality; 2021 Nov; 26(6):706-724. PubMed ID: 33906579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.