These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31873200)

  • 41. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory.
    Scofield JE; Buchanan EM; Kostic B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):997-1012. PubMed ID: 28744766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reflections on the origins of meta-analysis.
    Rosenthal R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 26355797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The role of meta-analysis and preregistration in assessing the evidence for cleansing effects.
    Ross RM; van Aert RCM; van den Akker OR; van Elk M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2021 Feb; 44():e19. PubMed ID: 33599601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect Declines Are Systematic, Strong, and Ubiquitous: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of the Decline Effect in Intelligence Research.
    Pietschnig J; Siegel M; Eder JSN; Gittler G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2874. PubMed ID: 31920891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2881-2899. PubMed ID: 32290810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative clinical trials in psychotherapy: Have large effects been replicated?
    Frost ND; Baskin TW; Wampold BE
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2020 May; 29():e128. PubMed ID: 32410720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science.
    Linden AH; Hönekopp J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 Mar; 16(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 33400613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.
    Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.