These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31873868)

  • 1. Cost Assessment Modelling of Treatments for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
    Mankinen P; Lundström T; Soini E; Sumelahti ML; Ruutiainen J; Niskala U; Järvinen E
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):800-818. PubMed ID: 31873868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.
    Hettle R; Harty G; Wong SL
    J Med Econ; 2018 Jul; 21(7):676-686. PubMed ID: 29618273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis in Portugal.
    Pinheiro B; Guerreiro R; Costa J; Miguel LS
    J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 31951777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-minimization analysis of alemtuzumab compared to fingolimod and natalizumab for the treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands.
    Piena MA; Heisen M; Wormhoudt LW; Wingerden JV; Frequin STFM; Uitdehaag BMJ
    J Med Econ; 2018 Oct; 21(10):968-976. PubMed ID: 29911917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets and fingolimod in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in Spain.
    Poveda JL; Trillo JL; Rubio-Terrés C; Rubio-Rodríguez D; Polanco A; Torres C
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2020 Jun; 20(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 31220959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of natalizumab vs fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analyses in Sweden.
    O'Day K; Meyer K; Stafkey-Mailey D; Watson C
    J Med Econ; 2015 Apr; 18(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 25422991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A discrete event simulation to model the cost-utility of fingolimod and natalizumab in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.
    Montgomery SM; Maruszczak MJ; Slater D; Kusel J; Nicholas R; Adlard N
    J Med Econ; 2017 May; 20(5):474-482. PubMed ID: 28008769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost Effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in The Netherlands.
    Michels RE; de Fransesco M; Mahajan K; Hengstman GJD; Schiffers KMH; Budhia S; Harty G; Krol M
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 17(6):857-873. PubMed ID: 31444659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran.
    Rezaee M; Izadi S; Keshavarz K; Borhanihaghighi A; Ravangard R
    J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 30561242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness of Natalizumab Compared With Fingolimod for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treatment in Colombia.
    Lasalvia P; Hernández F; Castañeda-Cardona C; Cuestas JA; Rosselli D
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Dec; 23():13-18. PubMed ID: 31999987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Price Reductions After Loss of Exclusivity in a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Fingolimod Versus Interferon Beta-1a for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
    Hua LH; Hersh CM; Morten P; Kusel J; Lin F; Cave J; Varga S; Herrera V; Ko JJ
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2019 Apr; 25(4):490-498. PubMed ID: 30917079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.
    Chirikov V; Ma I; Joshi N; Patel D; Smith A; Giambrone C; Cornelio N; Hashemi L
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 30711061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the administration and monitoring time burden of several disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom: A time and motion study.
    Rog D; Brownlee W; Carod-Artal FJ; Kalra S; Barker N; Lowndes C; Pendlebury J; Leclerc S; Amin A; Ashton L; Evans H; De Cock E
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2024 Feb; 82():105380. PubMed ID: 38183696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-utility analysis of alemtuzumab in comparison with interferon beta, fingolimod, and natalizumab treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria.
    Walter E; Berger T; Bajer-Kornek B; Deisenhammer F
    J Med Econ; 2019 Mar; 22(3):226-237. PubMed ID: 30522373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost minimisation analysis of fingolimod vs natalizumab as a second line of treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
    Crespo C; Izquierdo G; García-Ruiz A; Granell M; Brosa M
    Neurologia; 2014 May; 29(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 24161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cladribine versus fingolimod, natalizumab and interferon β for multiple sclerosis.
    Kalincik T; Jokubaitis V; Spelman T; Horakova D; Havrdova E; Trojano M; Lechner-Scott J; Lugaresi A; Prat A; Girard M; Duquette P; Grammond P; Solaro C; Grand'Maison F; Hupperts R; Prevost J; Sola P; Ferraro D; Terzi M; Butler E; Slee M; Kermode A; Fabis-Pedrini M; McCombe P; Barnett M; Shaw C; Hodgkinson S; Butzkueven H;
    Mult Scler; 2018 Oct; 24(12):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 28857680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fingolimod reduces direct medical costs compared to natalizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in The Netherlands.
    Heisen M; Treur MJ; van der Hel WS; Frequin ST; Groot MT; Verheggen BG
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1149-58. PubMed ID: 22737996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the comparative efficacy of cladribine tablets versus alternative disease modifying treatments in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: adjusting for patient characteristics using meta-regression and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison approaches.
    Berardi A; Siddiqui MK; Treharne C; Harty G; Wong SL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Aug; 35(8):1371-1378. PubMed ID: 30786783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-minimization analysis of fingolimod compared with natalizumab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Sweden.
    Bergvall N; Tambour M; Henriksson F; Fredrikson S
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23211038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using cladribine (in tablets) for treatment of adult patients with remitting multiple sclerosis].
    Avxentyev NA; Davydovskaya MV; Makarova YV; Frolov MY; Klabukova DL
    Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 2021; 121(8):30-36. PubMed ID: 34481433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.