159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31873956)
1. "Comparative intra- and inter-rater reliability of maximal voluntary contraction with unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation and construct validity with Peritron manometer".
Silva JBD; Sato TO; Rocha APR; Driusso P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):721-731. PubMed ID: 31873956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation to evaluation of maximal voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles considering risk factors and dysfunctions.
da Silva JB; de Oliveira Sato T; Rocha APR; Driusso P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Jan; 40(1):348-357. PubMed ID: 33152173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the PERFECT scheme assessed by unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation.
da Silva JB; de Godoi Fernandes JG; Caracciolo BR; Zanello SC; de Oliveira Sato T; Driusso P
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3199-3207. PubMed ID: 33416969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there agreement between the preference of examiner and women for unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation? A qualitative study.
da Silva JB; Rocha APR; Sato TO; Driusso P
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 34331079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: A reliability and correlation study.
Navarro Brazález B; Torres Lacomba M; de la Villa P; Sánchez Sánchez B; Prieto Gómez V; Asúnsolo Del Barco Á; McLean L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):269-277. PubMed ID: 28455942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure.
Bø K; Finckenhagen HB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Oct; 80(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 11580731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between maximum voluntary contraction and endurance measured by digital palpation and manometry: An observational study.
Fitz FF; Stüpp L; Costa TF; Sartori MG; Girão MJ; Castro RA
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016 Oct; 62(7):635-640. PubMed ID: 27925042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What are the cut-off points for vaginal manometry to differentiate women with a weak from those with a strong pelvic floor muscle contraction?: Vaginal manometry to classify a pelvic floor muscle contraction.
Barbosa-Silva J; Sato TO; Homsi Jorge C; Armijo-Olivo S; Driusso P
Braz J Phys Ther; 2023; 27(6):100572. PubMed ID: 38043160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer.
Abe-Takahashi Y; Kitta T; Ouchi M; Okayauchi M; Chiba H; Higuchi M; Togo M; Shinohara N
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):257. PubMed ID: 33213429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of manometry for assessing pelvic floor muscle function in healthy men.
Ouchi M; Kitta T; Takahashi Y; Chiba H; Higuchi M; Togo M; Shinohara N
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 32339324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer.
Ferreira CH; Barbosa PB; de Oliveira Souza F; Antônio FI; Franco MM; Bø K
Physiotherapy; 2011 Jun; 97(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 21497247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of intravaginal pressure measurements with a new intravaginal pressure device: The FemFit®.
Cacciari LP; Kruger J; Goodman J; Budgett D; Dumoulin C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jan; 39(1):253-260. PubMed ID: 31588623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women.
Sartori DV; Gameiro MO; Yamamoto HA; Kawano PR; Guerra R; Padovani CR; Amaro JL
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25888237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools.
Frawley HC; Galea MP; Phillips BA; Sherburn M; Bø K
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 16299815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer.
Tennfjord MK; Engh ME; Bø K
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1507-1514. PubMed ID: 28299404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are visual inspection and digital palpation reliable methods to assess ability to perform a pelvic floor muscle contraction? An intra-rater study.
Pena CC; Bø K; de la Ossa AMP; Fernandes ACNL; Aleixo DN; de Oliveira FMF; Ferreira CHJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Feb; 40(2):680-687. PubMed ID: 33476075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships Between 3-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound Imaging and Digital Intravaginal Palpation Assessments of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women With and Without Provoked Vestibulodynia.
Thibault-Gagnon S; Goldfinger C; Pukall C; Chamberlain S; McLean L
J Sex Med; 2018 Mar; 15(3):346-360. PubMed ID: 29502982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between measurements obtained with three different perineometers.
Barbosa PB; Franco MM; Souza Fde O; Antônio FI; Montezuma T; Ferreira CH
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2009; 64(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 19578656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-rater reliability of assessment of levator ani muscle strength and attachment to the pubic bone in nulliparous women.
van Delft K; Schwertner-Tiepelmann N; Thakar R; Sultan AH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 42(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 23371476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-rater reliability of the digital palpation of pelvic floor muscle by the modified Oxford Grading Scale in continent and incontinent women.
Romero-Cullerés G; Jané-Feixas C; Vilaseca-Grané A; Arnau A; Montesinos J; Abenoza-Guardiola M
Arch Esp Urol; 2019 Jul; 72(6):602-607. PubMed ID: 31274126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
