159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31873956)
41. Assessment of the bearing-down manoeuvre in pregnancy and detection of paradoxical levator ani muscle contraction using 2D transperineal ultrasound and vaginal palpation: a concurrent validity and inter-rater reliability study.
Murdoch-Ward J; Nahon I; De-Vitry Smith S; Bernardi E; Woods T
BJOG; 2024 May; 131(6):843-847. PubMed ID: 37846213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Pelvic floor muscle injuries 6 weeks post partum-an intra- and inter-rater study.
Staer-Jensen J; Siafarikas F; Hilde G; Braekken IH; Bø K; Engh ME
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):993-7. PubMed ID: 23280961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Reliability of different electromyographic normalization methods for pelvic floor muscles assessment.
Pereira-Baldon VS; de Oliveira AB; Padilha JF; Degani AM; Avila MA; Driusso P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Apr; 39(4):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 32119158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effectiveness of adding voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction to a Pilates exercise program: an assessor-masked randomized controlled trial.
Torelli L; de Jarmy Di Bella ZI; Rodrigues CA; Stüpp L; Girão MJ; Sartori MG
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1743-1752. PubMed ID: 27250831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Test-retest intra-rater reliability of vaginal measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength using Myomed 932.
Sigurdardottir T; Steingrimsdottir T; Arnason A; Bø K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(8):939-43. PubMed ID: 19579139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reliability and validity of a mobile home pelvic floor muscle trainer: The Elvie Trainer.
Czyrnyj CS; Bérubé MÈ; Brooks K; Varette K; McLean L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Aug; 39(6):1717-1731. PubMed ID: 32557767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Verbal and Visual Feedback Immediately Affect the Electromyographic Activity of Female Pelvic Floor Muscles.
Silva JBD; Szkudlarek AC; Gallo RBS; Valadão APM; Avila MA; Driusso P; Korelo RIG
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021; 44(9):743-750. PubMed ID: 35753882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does size matter? Perineometer and digital examination of a model levator hiatus.
Tailor VK; Bhide AA; Fernando R; Digesu GA; Khullar V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1338-1344. PubMed ID: 32394457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Test-retest reliability of the different dynamometric variables used to evaluate pelvic floor musculature during the menstrual cycle.
Dos Reis Nagano RC; Biasotto-Gonzalez DA; da Costa GL; Amorim KM; Fumagalli MA; Amorim CF; Politti F
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Nov; 37(8):2606-2613. PubMed ID: 29664139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparative assessment of pelvic floor function using vaginal cones, vaginal digital palpation and vaginal pressure measurements.
Hahn I; Milsom I; Ohlsson BL; Ekelund P; Uhlemann C; Fall M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1996; 41(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 8793498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. How well can pelvic floor muscles with major defects contract? A cross-sectional comparative study 6 weeks after delivery using transperineal 3D/4D ultrasound and manometer.
Hilde G; Staer-Jensen J; Siafarikas F; Gjestland K; Ellström Engh M; Bø K
BJOG; 2013 Oct; 120(11):1423-9. PubMed ID: 23834432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength.
Hundley AF; Wu JM; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1583-91. PubMed ID: 15902162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients.
Ohura T; Hase K; Nakajima Y; Nakayama T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28841846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society.
Slieker-ten Hove MC; Pool-Goudzwaard AL; Eijkemans MJ; Steegers-Theunissen RP; Burger CW; Vierhout ME
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 19090583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Vaginal Dynamometer to Measure Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength.
Romero-Cullerés G; Peña-Pitarch E; Jané-Feixas C; Vilaseca-Grané A; Montesinos J; Arnau A
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(8):514-519. PubMed ID: 31860565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of three interventions in facilitating voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in women: a randomized controlled trial.
Mateus-Vasconcelos ECL; Brito LGO; Driusso P; Silva TD; Antônio FI; Ferreira CHJ
Braz J Phys Ther; 2018; 22(5):391-399. PubMed ID: 29429823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contractility: digital palpation versus 2D and 3D perineal ultrasound.
Albrich S; Steetskamp J; Knoechel SL; Porta S; Hoffmann G; Skala C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):839-43. PubMed ID: 26408007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Inter-rater reliability study of the Peritron™ perineometer in pregnant women.
Ribeiro Jdos S; Guirro EC; Franco Mde M; Duarte TB; Pomini JM; Ferreira CH
Physiother Theory Pract; 2016; 32(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 27046803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparisons of Electromyography and Digital Palpation Measurement of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Postpartum Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Asymptomatic Parturients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Yang X; Zhu L; Li W; Sun X; Huang Q; Tong B; Xie Z
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 31336374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle displacement measurements during voluntary contractions.
Moser H; Luginbuehl H; Baeyens JP; Radlinger L
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2093-2100. PubMed ID: 30949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
