182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31874336)
21. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Multireader Exploratory Evaluation of Individual Pulse Sequence Cancer Detection on Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Gaur S; Harmon S; Gupta RT; Margolis DJ; Lay N; Mehralivand S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 29705281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa).
Patel P; Wang S; Siddiqui MM
Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Sep; 20(10):60. PubMed ID: 31478113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation: Impact of the Individual Radiologist and Clinical Factors.
Pickersgill NA; Vetter JM; Raval NS; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Ippolito JE; Kim EH
Urology; 2019 May; 127():68-73. PubMed ID: 30807773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.
Rouvière O; Puech P; Renard-Penna R; Claudon M; Roy C; Mège-Lechevallier F; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Magaud L; Remontet L; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Schott AM; Lemaitre L; Rabilloud M; Grenier N;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):100-109. PubMed ID: 30470502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study.
Cuocolo R; Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Romeo V; Verde F; Creta M; La Rocca R; Longo N; Pace L; Imbriaco M
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():144-149. PubMed ID: 31153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of ADC ratio in discriminating true and false positives in multiparametric prostatic MRI.
Falaschi Z; Valenti M; Lanzo G; Attanasio S; Valentini E; García Navarro LI; Aquilini F; Stecco A; Carriero A
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 128():109024. PubMed ID: 32387923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of Prostate Cancer with Gleason Score of at Least 7 by Using Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging: Validation of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System in Patients Referred for Prostate Biopsy.
Dinh AH; Melodelima C; Souchon R; Moldovan PC; Bratan F; Pagnoux G; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Crouzet S; Colombel M; Rouvière O
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):525-533. PubMed ID: 29361244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of gadolinium in magnetic resonance imaging for early prostate cancer diagnosis: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Cosma I; Tennstedt-Schenk C; Winzler S; Psychogios MN; Pfeil A; Teichgraeber U; Malich A; Papageorgiou I
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227031. PubMed ID: 31869380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists.
Pickersgill NA; Vetter JM; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Fowler KJ; Mintz AJ; Siegel CL; Kim EH
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):267-272. PubMed ID: 30327280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
