335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31874647)
1. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for identification of somatic variants using the Ion Torrent deep targeted sequencing platform.
Deshpande A; Lang W; McDowell T; Sivakumar S; Zhang J; Wang J; San Lucas FA; Fowler J; Kadara H; Scheet P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):5. PubMed ID: 29301485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.
Kockan C; Hach F; Sarrafi I; Bell RH; McConeghy B; Beja K; Haegert A; Wyatt AW; Volik SV; Chi KN; Collins CC; Sahinalp SC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 27531099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and optimization of the Ion Torrent S5 XL sequencer and Oncomine workflow for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.
Shin S; Kim Y; Chul Oh S; Yu N; Lee ST; Rak Choi J; Lee KA
Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(21):34858-34866. PubMed ID: 28422718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cancer cell-line titration series for evaluating somatic classification.
Denroche RE; Mullen L; Timms L; Beck T; Yung CK; Stein L; McPherson JD; Brown AM
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Dec; 8():823. PubMed ID: 26708082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance comparison of NextSeq and Ion Proton platforms for molecular diagnosis of clinical oncology.
Cao F; Gao L; Wei L; Chen Z; Wang Y; Ran X; Meng X; Tao J
Tumori; 2017 May; 103(3):223-230. PubMed ID: 28127742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data.
Cai L; Yuan W; Zhang Z; He L; Chou KC
Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36540. PubMed ID: 27874022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research.
Lai Z; Markovets A; Ahdesmaki M; Chapman B; Hofmann O; McEwen R; Johnson J; Dougherty B; Barrett JC; Dry JR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jun; 44(11):e108. PubMed ID: 27060149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Yeo ZX; Wong JC; Rozen SG; Lee AS
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):516. PubMed ID: 24962530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis.
Pei S; Liu T; Ren X; Li W; Chen C; Xie Z
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32698196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GLM-based optimization of NGS data analysis: A case study of Roche 454, Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina NextSeq sequencing data.
Sandmann S; de Graaf AO; van der Reijden BA; Jansen JH; Dugas M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171983. PubMed ID: 28222155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. VarBen: Generating in Silico Reference Data Sets for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipeline Evaluation.
Li Z; Fang S; Zhang R; Yu L; Zhang J; Bu D; Sun L; Zhao Y; Li J
J Mol Diagn; 2021 Mar; 23(3):285-299. PubMed ID: 33346148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.
Ura H; Togi S; Niida Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 32429412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
