These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31875366)
1. [Discussion and improvement methods of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction]. Guo H; Yu Z; Ma G; Li C Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 36(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 31875366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes. Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase processing for quantitative susceptibility mapping of regions with large susceptibility and lack of signal. Fortier V; Levesque IR Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3103-3113. PubMed ID: 29130526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the accuracy and precision of TE-dependent versus multi-echo QSM using Laplacian-based methods at 3 T. Biondetti E; Karsa A; Thomas DL; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 32491224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection. Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A multi-channel input convolutional neural network for artifact reduction in quantitative susceptibility mapping]. Si W; Feng Y Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2022 Dec; 42(12):1799-1806. PubMed ID: 36651247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov regularization. Sun H; Wilman AH Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 23666788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. Wei H; Dibb R; Zhou Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Wang N; Liu C NMR Biomed; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1294-303. PubMed ID: 26313885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method. Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]