These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31876172)

  • 21. Eliciting accounts of alleged child sexual abuse: how do children report touch?
    Teoh YS; Pipe ME; Johnson ZH; Lamb ME
    J Child Sex Abus; 2014; 23(7):792-803. PubMed ID: 25101533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden.
    Cederborg AC; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2000 Oct; 24(10):1355-61. PubMed ID: 11075701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):113-127. PubMed ID: 32175750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Repeated Questioning on Interviewers: Learning From a Forensic Interview Training Project.
    Duron JF; Cheung M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):347-62. PubMed ID: 27266533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "Because she's one who listens": children discuss disclosure recipients in forensic interviews.
    Malloy LC; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Child Maltreat; 2013 Nov; 18(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 23897746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
    Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of multipart prompts on children's testimonies in sexual abuse investigations.
    Katz C; Hershkowitz I
    Child Abuse Negl; 2012; 36(11-12):753-9. PubMed ID: 23069782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of intra- versus post-interview feedback during simulated practice interviews about child abuse.
    Powell MB; Fisher RP; Hughes-Scholes CH
    Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Feb; 32(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 18313750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Memorandum of Good Practice: theory versus application.
    Sternberg KJ; Lamb ME; Davies GM; Westcott HL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 May; 25(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 11428428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.
    Henderson HM; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33176442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repeated Self- and Peer-Review Leads to Continuous Improvement in Child Interviewing Performance.
    Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Forensic Soc Work; 2015; 5(1-3):20-28. PubMed ID: 27239248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of investigators' verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims.
    Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ; Hershkowitz I; Horowitz D
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):699-708. PubMed ID: 11105480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Setting course: the case for the credentialing of forensic interviewers.
    Haney M; Vieth VI; Campos HM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2010 Nov; 19(6):709-27. PubMed ID: 21113836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse.
    Korkman J; Santtila P; Sandnabba NK
    Scand J Psychol; 2006 Apr; 47(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 16542353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Mar; 25(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 11414392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol: A Meta-Analytic Review.
    Benia LR; Hauck-Filho N; Dillenburg M; Stein LM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2015; 24(3):259-79. PubMed ID: 25942285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of paraphrasing in investigative interviews.
    Evans AD; Roberts KP; Price HL; Stefek CP
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Aug; 34(8):585-92. PubMed ID: 20541260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of the NICHD protocol to enhance the quantity of details obtained from children with low verbal abilities in investigative interviews: a pilot study.
    Dion J; Cyr M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2008; 17(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 19042243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners: Finding water, leading horses, but can we get them to drink?
    Lamb ME
    Am Psychol; 2016 Nov; 71(8):710-718. PubMed ID: 27977251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.