These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31876350)

  • 1. Management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock using mechanical circulatory support with the Impella device.
    Sharma S; Polak S; George Z; LeDoux J; Sohn R; Stys A; Jeon C; Ghazzawi Y; Wood M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 97(1):74-77. PubMed ID: 31876350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.
    Mastroianni C; Bouabdallaoui N; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Feb; 6(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26873912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry.
    Annamalai SK; Esposito ML; Jorde L; Schreiber T; A Hall S; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK
    J Card Fail; 2018 Oct; 24(10):706-710. PubMed ID: 30244180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impella Mechanical Circulatory Support for Takotsubo Syndrome With Shock: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
    Napp LC; Westenfeld R; Møller JE; Pappalardo F; Ibrahim K; Bonello L; Wilkins C; Pershad A; Mannino SF; Schreiber TL; Hall PA; Medjamia AM; Haurand JM; Sieweke JT; Schäfer A; Grines CL; Burkhoff D; Moses JW; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Kapur NK; Bauersachs J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jul; 40():113-119. PubMed ID: 34916157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiogenic shock in a young woman with SCAD: The importance of early access to VA-ECMO in the community.
    Ya'Qoub L; Alqarqaz M; Cowger J; Nemeh H; Basir MB; Alaswad K; Koenig G
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Feb; 59():81-83. PubMed ID: 37385894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcaval access for the emergency delivery of 5.0 liters per minute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
    Afana M; Altawil M; Basir M; Alqarqaz M; Alaswad K; Eng M; O'Neill WW; Lederman RJ; Greenbaum AB
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):555-564. PubMed ID: 32902101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of the impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support.
    Lemaire A; Anderson MB; Prendergast T; Stockmaster N; Goodman A; Lozane AM; Batsides G
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 23571788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
    Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock.
    Lemaire A; Anderson MB; Lee LY; Scholz P; Prendergast T; Goodman A; Lozano AM; Spotnitz A; Batsides G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 97(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 24090575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection with cardiogenic shock: How frequent is it? How should we treat it?
    Smith T; Henry TD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 97(1):78-79. PubMed ID: 33460267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impella 5.0 Support in INTERMACS II Cardiogenic Shock Patients Using Right and Left Axillary Artery Access.
    Schibilsky D; Lausberg H; Haller C; Lenglinger M; Woernle B; Haeberle H; Rosenberger P; Walker T; Schlensak C
    Artif Organs; 2015 Aug; 39(8):660-3. PubMed ID: 26147682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secular Trend in the Use and Implementation of Impella in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Experience.
    Hritani AW; Wani AS; Olet S; Lauterbach CJ; Allaqaband SQ; Bajwa T; Jan MF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 31(9):E265-E270. PubMed ID: 31478893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery.
    Sayed S; Schimmer C; Shade I; Leyh R; Aleksic I
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):38. PubMed ID: 28532425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Indications of IMPELLA Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Tertiary Centre.
    Monteagudo Vela M; Simon A; Riesgo Gil F; Rosenberg A; Dalby M; Kabir T; García Saez D; Panoulas V
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 May; 21(5):629-637. PubMed ID: 31859100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impella CP use in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock.
    Maniuc O; Salinger T; Anders F; Müntze J; Liu D; Hu K; Ertl G; Frantz S; Nordbeck P
    ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Aug; 6(4):863-866. PubMed ID: 31095902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the Impella Device for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - Experience From a Single Heart Center With Analysis of Long-term Mortality.
    Schroeter MR; Köhler H; Wachter A; Bleckmann A; Hasenfuß G; Schillinger W
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 28(12):467-472. PubMed ID: 27529657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.