These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31876350)

  • 21. Outcomes of Impella CP insertion during cardiac arrest: A single center experience.
    Kamran H; Batra S; Venesy DM; Patten RD; Waxman S; Pyne C; Shah SP
    Resuscitation; 2020 Feb; 147():53-56. PubMed ID: 31891791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemodynamic support with Impella ventricular assist device in patients undergoing TAVI: A single center experience.
    Almalla M; Kersten A; Altiok E; Marx N; Schröder JW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 31268621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 and the Impella Left Direct pumps for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital.
    David CH; Quessard A; Mastroianni C; Hekimian G; Amour J; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jan; 57(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 31270535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preliminary experience with Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: a new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit.
    Bresson D; Sibellas F; Farhat F; Jegaden O; Kirkorian G; Bonnefoy E
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2011 Aug; 104(8-9):458-64. PubMed ID: 21944148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of Impella heart pump for management of women with peripartum cardiogenic shock.
    Elkayam U; Schäfer A; Chieffo A; Lansky A; Hall S; Arany Z; Grines C
    Clin Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):974-981. PubMed ID: 31436333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy with cardiogenic shock after influenza infection successfully recovered by IMPELLA support.
    Nakamura M; Nakagaito M; Hori M; Ueno H; Kinugawa K
    J Artif Organs; 2019 Dec; 22(4):330-333. PubMed ID: 31228028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry.
    Lauten A; Engström AE; Jung C; Empen K; Erne P; Cook S; Windecker S; Bergmann MW; Klingenberg R; Lüscher TF; Haude M; Rulands D; Butter C; Ullman B; Hellgren L; Modena MG; Pedrazzini G; Henriques JP; Figulla HR; Ferrari M
    Circ Heart Fail; 2013 Jan; 6(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 23212552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical Circulatory Support With Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Recovery in Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.
    Beneduce A; Fausta Bertoldi L; Melillo F; Baldetti L; Spoladore R; Slavich M; Oppizzi M; Margonato A; Pappalardo F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(4):e31-e32. PubMed ID: 30711550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Due to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Versus Cardiogenic Shock Due to Coronary Artery Disease.
    Krittanawong C; Qadeer YK; Ang SP; Wang Z; Alam M; Sharma S; Jneid H
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2024 Sep; 23(3):141-148. PubMed ID: 38467033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impella support as a bridge to heart surgery in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Saito S; Shibasaki I; Matsuoka T; Niitsuma K; Hirota S; Kanno Y; Kanazawa Y; Tezuka M; Takei Y; Tsuchiya G; Konishi T; Ogata K; Fukuda H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(2):. PubMed ID: 35373286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center.
    Vecchio S; Chechi T; Giuliani G; Lilli A; Consoli L; Spaziani G; Giannotti F; Margheri M
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Aug; 56(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18614983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device.
    O'Neill WW; Grines C; Schreiber T; Moses J; Maini B; Dixon SR; Ohman EM
    Am Heart J; 2018 Aug; 202():33-38. PubMed ID: 29803984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B; Seelmaier C; Leistner D; Stähli BE; Pretsch I; Lichtenauer M; Jung C; Hoppe UC; Landmesser U; Thiele H; Lauten A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock.
    Jensen PB; Kann SH; Veien KT; Møller-Helgestad OK; Dahl JS; Rud CS; Jensen MK; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Møller JE
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2018 Feb; 7(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 29148290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Incidence and outcomes of cardiogenic shock among women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
    Osman M; Syed M; Simpson TF; Bhardwaj B; Kheiri B; Divanji P; Golwala H; Zahr F; Cigarroa JE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Oct; 100(4):530-534. PubMed ID: 36073664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience.
    Pieri M; Contri R; Winterton D; Montorfano M; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; De Bonis M; Pappalardo F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Oct; 15():126. PubMed ID: 26466899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.