These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31877512)

  • 1. Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses.
    Zhong J; Guazzato M; Chen J; Zhang Z; Sun G; Huo X; Liu X; Ahmad R; Li Q
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103490. PubMed ID: 31877512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.
    Aboelfadl A; Keilig L; Ebeid K; Ahmed MAM; Nouh I; Refaie A; Bourauel C
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 38622680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
    Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis.
    Deste G; Durkan R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):456-463. PubMed ID: 32246650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.
    Durkan R; Oyar P; Deste G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 31923295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design.
    Rojas Vizcaya F
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants.
    de Matos JDM; Lopes GDRS; Nakano LJN; Ramos NC; Vasconcelos JEL; Bottino MA; Tribst JPM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Feb; 25(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 34559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gürbüz A; Güçlü ZB; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Aug; 67(4):307-315. PubMed ID: 35587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the design of a mandibular implant-supported zirconia prosthesis on stress distribution.
    Oyar P; Durkan R; Deste G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):502.e1-502.e11. PubMed ID: 32893017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Yu W; Chen S; Ma L; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 35546271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations.
    Yu W; Li X; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 35305832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
    Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
    J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
    Morton D; Gallucci G; Lin WS; Pjetursson B; Polido W; Roehling S; Sailer I; Aghaloo T; Albera H; Bohner L; Braut V; Buser D; Chen S; Dawson A; Eckert S; Gahlert M; Hamilton A; Jaffin R; Jarry C; Karayazgan B; Laine J; Martin W; Rahman L; Schlegel A; Shiota M; Stilwell C; Vorster C; Zembic A; Zhou W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():215-223. PubMed ID: 30328196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.