These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31878058)

  • 1. The Tolerability and Efficacy of 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Muscle Fatigability.
    Workman CD; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Brain Sci; 2019 Dec; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 31878058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased leg muscle fatigability during 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over the left motor cortex.
    Workman CD; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):333-343. PubMed ID: 31919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at 4 mA Induces Greater Leg Muscle Fatigability in Women Compared to Men.
    Workman CD; Fietsam AC; Rudroff T
    Brain Sci; 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32326236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different Effects of 2 mA and 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Muscle Activity and Torque in a Maximal Isokinetic Fatigue Task.
    Workman CD; Fietsam AC; Rudroff T
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():240. PubMed ID: 32714170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women report more severe sensations from 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation than men.
    Workman CD; Fietsam AC; Kamholz J; Rudroff T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2696-2702. PubMed ID: 33259084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Estrogen Levels Cause Greater Leg Muscle Fatigability in Eumenorrheic Young Women after 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Deters JR; Fietsam AC; Workman CD; Rudroff T
    Brain Sci; 2022 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35448037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
    J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal Protective Equipment Alters Leg Muscle Fatigability Independent of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comparison with Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic Results.
    Fietsam AC; Deters JR; Workman CD; Rudroff T
    Brain Sci; 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34439581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.
    Paneri B; Adair D; Thomas C; Khadka N; Patel V; Tyler WJ; Parra L; Bikson M
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):740-754. PubMed ID: 27372844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode.
    El Jamal C; Harrie A; Rahman-Filipiak A; Iordan AD; DaSilva AF; Ploutz-Snyder R; Khadr L; Vesia M; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
    Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(5):1328-1335. PubMed ID: 37660936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.
    Reckow J; Rahman-Filipiak A; Garcia S; Schlaefflin S; Calhoun O; DaSilva AF; Bikson M; Hampstead BM
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):991-997. PubMed ID: 29784589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Training in Healthy Individuals: A Triple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.
    Maeda K; Yamaguchi T; Tatemoto T; Kondo K; Otaka Y; Tanaka S
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():179. PubMed ID: 28420959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK
    J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors.
    Angius L; Pageaux B; Hopker J; Marcora SM; Mauger AR
    Neuroscience; 2016 Dec; 339():363-375. PubMed ID: 27751960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
    Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.