These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31878189)
1. Consumer Preferences for Traceable Food with Different Functions of Safety Information Attributes: Evidence from a Menu-Based Choice Experiment in China. Hou B; Hou J; Wu L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute. Chen M; Hu E; Kuen LL; Wu L Front Psychol; 2021; 12():675554. PubMed ID: 34276494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability. Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers' decoy effect when purchasing pork with traceability technologies. Chen M; Liu P; Wu L Front Public Health; 2022; 10():941936. PubMed ID: 35968432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors. Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification. Liu Z; Yu Z; Zhao J; Han X; Li C; Geng N; Yu M PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306041. PubMed ID: 38941301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A study on Chinese consumer preferences for food traceability information using best-worst scaling. Liu C; Li J; Steele W; Fang X PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206793. PubMed ID: 30388166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing. Ortega DL; Hong SJ; Wang HH; Wu L Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consumer Perception of Retail Pork Bacon Attributes Using Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis and Maximum Differential Scaling. McLean KG; Hanson DJ; Jervis SM; Drake MA J Food Sci; 2017 Nov; 82(11):2659-2668. PubMed ID: 29058811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage. Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer preferences for pig welfare - Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork? Denver S; Sandøe P; Christensen T Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():140-146. PubMed ID: 28284125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China. Zhou M; Guan B; Huang L Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Imported Milk: Based on Shanghai, China. Xu L; Yang X; Wu L Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31905802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya. Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health Is Wealth: Study on Consumer Preferences and the Willingness to Pay for Ecological Agricultural Product Traceability Technology: Evidence from Jiangxi Province China. Chen X; Shang J; Zada M; Zada S; Ji X; Han H; Ariza-Montes A; Ramírez-Sobrino J Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study on consumers' choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios. Xu L; Yu M; Chen X Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1016933. PubMed ID: 36304864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceived Value of Information Attributes: Accounting for Consumer Heterogeneous Preference and Valuation for Traceable Agri-Food. Liu R; Wang J; Liang J; Ma H; Liang F Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36832785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork. Verbeke W; Liu R Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter? Jiang X; Chen X; Wu L J Food Sci; 2024 Sep; 89(9):5823-5840. PubMed ID: 39098815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A conjoint analysis to consumer choice in Brazil: Defining device attributes for recognizing customized foods characteristics. Calegari LP; Barbosa J; Marodin GA; Fettermann DC Food Res Int; 2018 Jul; 109():1-13. PubMed ID: 29803431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]