These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31878835)

  • 1. Anticipation of aversive threat potentiates task-irrelevant attentional capture.
    Gutierrez M; Berggren N
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Aug; 34(5):1036-1043. PubMed ID: 31878835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tuning in to anxiety-related differences in attentional control: Apprehension of threat improves template switching during visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):1083-1090. PubMed ID: 33749293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anxiety and apprehension in visual working memory performance: no change to capacity, but poorer distractor filtering.
    Berggren N
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2020 May; 33(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 32126798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Don't worry, it won't be fine. Contributions of worry and anxious arousal to startle responses and event-related potentials in threat anticipation.
    Carsten HP; Härpfer K; Nelson BD; Kathmann N; Riesel A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 23(4):1141-1159. PubMed ID: 37106311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.
    Massar SA; Mol NM; Kenemans JL; Baas JM
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):805-17. PubMed ID: 21824022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid attentional biases to threat-associated visual features: The roles of anxiety and visual working memory access.
    Berggren N
    Emotion; 2022 Apr; 22(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 32567877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trait anxiety reduces implicit expectancy during target spatial probability cueing.
    Berggren N; Derakshan N
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 23046457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):975-988. PubMed ID: 28303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety-linked attention bias in visual search.
    Dodd HF; Vogt J; Turkileri N; Notebaert L
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 122():13-20. PubMed ID: 26844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear-catching? Real-world distractibility scores predict susceptibility to auditory attentional capture.
    Murphy S; Dalton P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1209-13. PubMed ID: 24563416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional bias, distractibility and short-term memory in anxiety.
    Lapointe ML; Blanchette I; Duclos M; Langlois F; Provencher MD; Tremblay S
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2013; 26(3):293-313. PubMed ID: 22762442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trait anxiety and the alignment of attentional bias with controllability of danger.
    Notebaert L; Georgiades JV; Herbert M; Grafton B; Parsons S; Fox E; MacLeod C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):743-756. PubMed ID: 30132194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control.
    Kim AJ; Lee DS; Anderson BA
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):980-986. PubMed ID: 32222868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional disengagement from negative natural sounds for high-anxious individuals.
    Wang Y; Xiao R; Luo C; Yang L
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2019 May; 32(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 30782012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The attentional processes underlying impaired inhibition of threat in anxiety: the remote distractor effect.
    Richards HJ; Benson V; Hadwin JA
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(5):934-42. PubMed ID: 22375840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.