These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31878869)

  • 1. ICGRM: integrative construction of genomic relationship matrix combining multiple genomic regions for big dataset.
    Jiang D; Xin C; Ye J; Yuan Y; Fang M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):731. PubMed ID: 31878869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a genomic relationship matrix for breed assignment of cattle breeds: comparison and combination with a machine learning method.
    Wilmot H; Niehoff T; Soyeurt H; Gengler N; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37220912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.
    Ødegård J; Indahl U; Strandén I; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Feb; 50(1):6. PubMed ID: 29490611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compression distance can discriminate animals by genetic profile, build relationship matrices and estimate breeding values.
    Hudson NJ; Porto-Neto L; Kijas JW; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():78. PubMed ID: 26464167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle.
    Veerkamp RF; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Dec; 48(1):95. PubMed ID: 27905878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection.
    Misztal I; Legarra A
    Animal; 2017 May; 11(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 27869042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of genomic BLUP when considering a genomic relationship matrix based on the number of the largest eigenvalues: a simulation study.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):75. PubMed ID: 31830899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):573-81. PubMed ID: 26944916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction of breeding values in the New Zealand sheep industry using a 50K SNP chip.
    Auvray B; McEwan JC; Newman SA; Lee M; Dodds KG
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4375-89. PubMed ID: 25149326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic analysis of within-litter variation in piglets' birth weight using genomic or pedigree relationship matrices.
    Sell-Kubiak E; Wang S; Knol EF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Apr; 93(4):1471-80. PubMed ID: 26020168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. parSMURF, a high-performance computing tool for the genome-wide detection of pathogenic variants.
    Petrini A; Mesiti M; Schubach M; Frasca M; Danis D; Re M; Grossi G; Cappelletti L; Castrignanò T; Robinson PN; Valentini G
    Gigascience; 2020 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 32444882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GAPIT Version 2: An Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction.
    Tang Y; Liu X; Wang J; Li M; Wang Q; Tian F; Su Z; Pan Y; Liu D; Lipka AE; Buckler ES; Zhang Z
    Plant Genome; 2016 Jul; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 27898829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.
    Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.