874 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31878944)
21. Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Hu K; Wang W; Liu X; Meng Q; Zhang F
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):249. PubMed ID: 30558636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patterns of spread in node-positive cervical cancer: the relationship between local control and distant metastases.
Stock RG; Chen AS; Karasek K
Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9166542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy involving paclitaxel and carboplatin and in FIGO stage IIIB/IVA cervical cancer patients.
Mabuchi S; Isohashi F; Okazawa M; Kitada F; Maruoka S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):e15. PubMed ID: 27958682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment outcomes of extended-field radiation therapy and the effect of concurrent chemotherapy on uterine cervical cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Yoon HI; Cha J; Keum KC; Lee HY; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim GE; Kim YB
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():18. PubMed ID: 25582425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Significance of Para-Aortic Nodal Size and the Role of Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: An Institutional Experience.
Manders DB; Sims TT; Bailey A; Hwang L; Richardson DL; Miller DS; Kehoe SM; Albuquerque KV; Lea JS
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Dec; 41(12):1225-1230. PubMed ID: 29782361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Para-aortic lymph node recurrence after curative radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Cho WK; Kim YI; Park W; Yang K; Kim H; Cha H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Sep; 29(7):1116-1120. PubMed ID: 31474588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing survival outcomes between surgical and radiographic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Yang J; Delara R; Magrina J; Magtibay P; Yi J; Langstraat C; Robertson M; Dinh T; Butler K
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 156(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 31843274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Salvage treatment for lymph node recurrence after radical resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen J; Yin W; Yao H; Gu W
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 31533757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Analysis of prognostic factors and therapeutic patterns of recurrent stage Ⅰb-Ⅱa cervical squamous carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy].
Ou ZJ; Zhao D; An JS; Sun CY; Huang MN; Li B; Wu LY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 31262124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.
Takekuma M; Kasamatsu Y; Kado N; Kuji S; Tanaka A; Takahashi N; Abe M; Hirashima Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Aug; 21(4):741-747. PubMed ID: 26857458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer with common iliac or para-aortic lymph node metastases: a retrospective review in a single institution.
Zhang G; Fu C; Zhang Y; Wang J; Qiao N; Yang Q; Cheng Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Sep; 22(7):1220-5. PubMed ID: 22854654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Liu J; Tang G; Zhou Q; Kuang W
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Aug; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 35978412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Who can benefit from a lymph node boost in definitive chemoradiotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: an evaluation of nodal failure in patients without nodal boost.
Kim H; Park W; Cho WK
J Radiat Res; 2020 May; 61(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 32211854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic PET Parameters in Cervical Cancer Patients With Metabolic Complete Response After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Son SH; Jeong SY; Chong GO; Lee YH; Park SH; Lee CH; Hong CM; Jeong JH; Lee SW; Ahn BC; Lee J
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 43(9):e296-e303. PubMed ID: 30036243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pathological Risk Factors and Outcomes in Women With Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Primary Radical Surgery Versus Chemoradiotherapy.
Bradbury M; Founta C; Taylor W; Kucukmetin A; Naik R; Ang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 26244756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Frequency and characteristics of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma in Japan: a multi-institutional study.
Niibe Y; Kazumoto T; Toita T; Yamazaki H; Higuchi K; Ii N; Suzuki K; Uno T; Tokumaru S; Takayama M; Sekiguchi K; Matsumoto Y; Michimoto K; Oguchi M; Hayakawa K
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 16677691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose, prophylactic, extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly cisplatin for patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer, positive pelvic lymph nodes, and negative para-aortic lymph nodes.
Liang JA; Chen SW; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Chang WC; Lin WC; Chang YY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jun; 24(5):901-7. PubMed ID: 23975081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcome and toxicity of radical radiotherapy or concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for elderly cervical cancer women.
Wang W; Hou X; Yan J; Shen J; Lian X; Sun S; Liu Z; Meng Q; Wang D; Zhao M; Qiu J; Hu K; Zhang F
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):510. PubMed ID: 28764676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Reyhan M; Parlak C; Guler OC; Oymak E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 23792605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
