These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31879240)

  • 1. Auditory Skills as a Predictor of Rater Reliability in the Evaluation of Vocal Quality.
    Avelino de Paiva MA; Diniz da Rosa MR; Gielow I; Marinho da Silva I; da Silva Sousa ES; França da Silva AC; Costa Silva PO; Lopes LW
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):559-569. PubMed ID: 31879240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality.
    Alves JDN; Almeida AAF; Yamasaki R; Lopes LW
    Codas; 2024; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Training With Anchors on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia in Speech-Language Pathology Students.
    Wong DW; Chan RW; Wu CH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1136-1156. PubMed ID: 33769849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Foreign Language Accent on Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonia.
    Marks KL; Dahl KL; Stepp CE
    Laryngoscope; 2024 May; 134(5):2272-2276. PubMed ID: 37942827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
    de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity?
    Sauder C; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 30195410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory Training With Synthesized Voice Anchors: Effects on Rater Agreement.
    Gama ACC; da Mata SM; Martins Dos Santos PC; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Quinino RDC
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):366-375. PubMed ID: 34702611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.
    Kelchner LN; Brehm SB; Weinrich B; Middendorf J; deAlarcon A; Levin L; Elluru R
    J Voice; 2010 Jul; 24(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 19135856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses.
    Englert M; V Latoszek BB; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 34348304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual and Quantitative Assessment of Dysphonia Across Vowel Categories.
    Anand S; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R; Eddins DA
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):473-481. PubMed ID: 29804803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
    Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.