These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31881043)

  • 1. Habitat quality, configuration and context effects on roe deer fecundity across a forested landscape mosaic.
    Zini V; Wäber K; Dolman PM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226666. PubMed ID: 31881043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer.
    Lovari S; Serrao G; Mori E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():115-120. PubMed ID: 28442429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satellite-based habitat monitoring reveals long-term dynamics of deer habitat in response to forest disturbances.
    Oeser J; Heurich M; Senf C; Pflugmacher D; Kuemmerle T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2269. PubMed ID: 33277745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related effects of body mass on fertility and litter size in roe deer.
    Flajšman K; Jerina K; Pokorny B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175579. PubMed ID: 28403161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality.
    Pettorelli N; Gaillard JM; Van Laere G; Duncan P; Kjellander P; Liberg O; Delorme D; Maillard D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):747-53. PubMed ID: 11934368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial variation in springtime food resources influences the winter body mass of roe deer fawns.
    Pettorelli N; Dray S; Gaillard JM; Chessel D; Duncan P; Illius A; Guillon N; Klein F; Van Laere G
    Oecologia; 2003 Nov; 137(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 12920639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore.
    Abbas F; Morellet N; Hewison AJ; Merlet J; Cargnelutti B; Lourtet B; Angibault JM; Daufresne T; Aulagnier S; Verheyden H
    Oecologia; 2011 Oct; 167(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 21519885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population development and landscape preference of reintroduced wild ungulates: successful rewilding in Southern Italy.
    Rivieccio E; Troiano C; Petrelli S; Maselli V; de Filippo G; Fulgione D; Buglione M
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14492. PubMed ID: 36530413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Condition-dependent natal dispersal in a large herbivore: heavier animals show a greater propensity to disperse and travel further.
    Debeffe L; Morellet N; Cargnelutti B; Lourtet B; Bon R; Gaillard JM; Mark Hewison AJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Nov; 81(6):1327. PubMed ID: 22844997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predation risk and longevity influence variation in fitness of female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.).
    Kjellander P; Gaillard JM; Hewison M; Liberg O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S338-40. PubMed ID: 15504011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-specific synchrony of two contrasting ungulates: wild boar (Sus scrofa) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus).
    Mysterud A; Tryjanowski P; Panek M; Pettorelli N; Stenseth NC
    Oecologia; 2007 Mar; 151(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 17102995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsed food resources, but not forest cover, determine lifetime reproductive success in a forest-dwelling rodent.
    Hoset KS; Villers A; Wistbacka R; Selonen V
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Sep; 86(5):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 28636171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer.
    Quéméré E; Gaillard JM; Galan M; Vanpé C; David I; Pellerin M; Kjellander P; Hewison AJM; Pemberton JM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 29592799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Habitat selection by Eld's deer following relocation to a patchy landscape.
    Pan D; Song YL; Zeng ZG; Bravery BD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91158. PubMed ID: 24614039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decomposing risk: landscape structure and wolf behavior generate different predation patterns in two sympatric ungulates.
    Gervasi V; Sand H; Zimmermann B; Mattisson J; Wabakken P; Linnell JD
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Oct; 23(7):1722-34. PubMed ID: 24261051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological conditions experienced by offspring during pregnancy and early post-natal life determine mandible size in roe deer.
    De Marinis AM; Chirichella R; Bottero E; Apollonio M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222150. PubMed ID: 31509573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations.
    Kjellander P; Gaillard JM; Hewison AJ
    Oecologia; 2006 Jan; 146(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 16341553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations.
    William G; Jean-Michel G; Sonia S; Christophe B; Atle M; Nicolas M; Maryline P; Clément C
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5102. PubMed ID: 29572510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial variation in red deer density in a transboundary forest ecosystem.
    Tourani M; Franke F; Heurich M; Henrich M; Peterka T; Ebert C; Oeser J; Edelhoff H; Milleret C; Dupont P; Bischof R; Peters W
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4561. PubMed ID: 36941335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of forest management and roe deer impact on a mountain forest development in the Italian Apennines: A modelling approach using LANDIS-II.
    Marcon A; Mladenoff DJ; Grignolio S; Apollonio M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224788. PubMed ID: 31693689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.