These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31881172)
1. The Opinion of Different Observer Groups About the Esthetic Impact and Need for Surgical Correction of Varying Submental Lengths. Naini FB; Laskin DM; Garagiola U; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 78(4):630.e1-630.e9. PubMed ID: 31881172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Submental-Cervical Angle: Perceived Attractiveness and Threshold Values of Desire for Surgery. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Dec; 15(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 27833339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative investigation of the esthetic impact of lip prominence in relation to the esthetic line. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Garagiola U; Wertheim D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 May; 159(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 33653639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The aesthetic impact of upper lip inclination in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25016578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and clinician. Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT Angle Orthod; 2012 Jan; 82(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21787197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Naini FB; Donaldson AN; Cobourne MT; McDonald F Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 21846874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: A quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 26880014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinician, dental student, and orthognathic patient perception of black-and-white silhouette lateral profile dimensions of ideal chin position in a Chinese population. Jiang Z; Tan L; Hu L; Wang C; Wang H; Xie Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Jan; 125(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29153275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of upper lip inclination on facial profile attractiveness: A perceptive analysis. Bora P; Agrawal P; Bagga DK; Priya K; Singh N; Bhardwaj R J Orthod Sci; 2024; 13():8. PubMed ID: 38516111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):192-206. PubMed ID: 21571417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists and laypersons in relation to the harmony of the smile. Lauria A; Rodrigues DC; de Medeiros RC; Moreira RW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1664-8. PubMed ID: 24969767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence. Modarai F; Donaldson JC; Naini FB Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 23530543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mentolabial angle and aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 39(1):4. PubMed ID: 28217687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson. Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 22340990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recognition of the Asymmetrical Smile: A Comparison of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypersons. Rostami S; Kang B; Tufekci E; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico CK; Laskin DM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 78(2):275-283. PubMed ID: 31574260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional aesthetic assessment of class II patients before and after orthognathic surgery and its association with quantitative surgical changes. Storms AS; Vansant L; Shaheen E; Coucke W; de Llano-Pérula MC; Jacobs R; Politis C; Willems G Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1664-1671. PubMed ID: 28751183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nasofrontal Angle and Nasal Dorsal Aesthetics: A Quantitative Investigation of Idealized and Normative Values. Naini FB; Cobourne MT; Garagiola U; McDonald F; Wertheim D Facial Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 27494590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles. Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]