191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31881241)
21. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
Priyank H; Verma A; Gupta K; Chaudhary E; Khandelwal D; Nihalani S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk factors for secondary caries in direct composite restorations in primary teeth.
Metz I; Rothmaier K; Pitchika V; Crispin A; Hickel R; Garcia-Godoy F; Bücher K; Kühnisch J
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Nov; 25(6):451-61. PubMed ID: 25736557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of different clinical criteria on the decision to replace restorations in primary teeth.
Moro BLP; Freitas RD; Pontes LRA; Pássaro AL; Lenzi TL; Tedesco TK; Ekstrand KR; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Cenci MS; Mendes FM
J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103421. PubMed ID: 32615237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Trial shows partial caries removal is an effective technique in primary molars.
Santamaria R; Innes N
Evid Based Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 25343394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Survival and Associated Risk Factors of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth: A Clinical, Retrospective, University-based Study.
Pedrotti D; Ribeiro JF; Weber Pires C; de Oliveira Rocha R; Ardenghi TM; Soares FZM; Lenzi TL
Pediatr Dent; 2017 Jul; 39(4):313-318. PubMed ID: 29122073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Substantial regional differences in the biomechanical behavior of molar treated with selective caries tissue removal technique: a finite element study.
Weimann D; Morgenthal A; Schwendicke F; Fleck C; Razi H
Dent Mater; 2021 Mar; 37(3):e162-e175. PubMed ID: 33358015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Marginal integrity in minimally invasive molar resin composite restorations: Impact of polymerization shrinkage.
Weimann D; Fleck C; Razi H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Jul; 155():106554. PubMed ID: 38676971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
Varpio M
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
