These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31881241)

  • 41. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
    Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Caries removal in deciduous teeth using an Er:YAG laser: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Valério RA; Borsatto MC; Serra MC; Polizeli SA; Nemezio MA; Galo R; Aires CP; Dos Santos AC; Corona SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 25877234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.
    Bayram M; Akgöl BB; Üstün N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 33009626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.
    Bianchi RMD; Pascareli-Carlos AM; Floriano I; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Gimenez T; Holanda MC; da Silva GS; de Natal KH; Tedesco TK
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 33789643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the efficacy of calcium silicate vs. glass ionomer cement indirect pulp capping and restoration assessment criteria: a randomised controlled clinical trial-2-year results.
    Hashem D; Mannocci F; Patel S; Manoharan A; Watson TF; Banerjee A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1931-1939. PubMed ID: 30232625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 25516885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Longevity of class 2 direct restorations in root-filled teeth: A retrospective clinical study.
    Scotti N; Eruli C; Comba A; Paolino DS; Alovisi M; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 25701467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of selective caries excavation on marginal penetration of class II composite restorations in vitro.
    Scholz KJ; Hinderberger M; Widbiller M; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Buchalla W
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Oct; 128(5):405-414. PubMed ID: 32749026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures.
    Chisini LA; Collares K; Cademartori MG; de Oliveira LJC; Conde MCM; Demarco FF; Corrêa MB
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Mar; 28(2):123-139. PubMed ID: 29322626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Durability of a low shrinkage TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system in Class II restorations. A 6-year follow up.
    van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):944-953. PubMed ID: 28545657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical Accuracy of Two Different Criteria for the Detection of Caries Lesions around Restorations in Primary Teeth.
    Moro BLP; Pontes LRA; Maia HC; Freitas RD; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Ekstrand KR; Imparato JCP; Cenci MS; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2022; 56(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 35504257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years.
    Lempel E; Lovász BV; Bihari E; Krajczár K; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
    Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1308-1318. PubMed ID: 31278018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.