These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31881373)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of forensic firearm examiners.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Brand NW; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110112. PubMed ID: 31881373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer-based comparisons.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Zheng XA; Soons JA; Stoel RD
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jan; 66(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 32970858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of GLOCK 9 mm Firing Pin Aperture Shear Mark Individuality Based On 1,632 Different Pistols by Traditional Pattern Matching and IBIS Pattern Recognition.
    Hamby JE; Norris S; Petraco ND
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 26390232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and interpretation of impressed marks left by a firearm on cartridge cases - Towards an operational implementation of a likelihood ratio based technique.
    Riva F; Mattijssen EJAT; Hermsen R; Pieper P; Kerkhoff W; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110363. PubMed ID: 32590197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of geometric moments as features for firearm identification.
    Md Ghani NA; Liong CY; Jemain AA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):143-9. PubMed ID: 20211535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating firearm examiner conclusion variability using cartridge case reproductions.
    Law EF; Morris KB
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1704-1720. PubMed ID: 34057735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of the possibility to use Siamese networks for the comparison of firing pin marks.
    Giverts P; Sorokina K; Fedorenko V
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Nov; 67(6):2416-2424. PubMed ID: 36149037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of firing pin impressions using HOG-SVM.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Harbison S; Wevers GE
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):1946-1957. PubMed ID: 37691406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying persistent and characteristic features in firearm tool marks on cartridge cases.
    Ott D; Soons J; Thompson R; Song J
    Surf Topogr; 2017; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 38590359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 1: Examiner error rates.
    Baldwin DP; Bajic SJ; Morris MD; Zamzow DS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111733. PubMed ID: 37257388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive biases in the peer review of bullet and cartridge case comparison casework: A field study.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jul; 60(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 32650935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image matching algorithms for breech face marks and firing pins in a database of spent cartridge cases of firearms.
    Geradts ZJ; Bijhold J; Hermsen R; Murtagh F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Jun; 119(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 11348799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying 3D measurements and computer matching algorithms to two firearm examination proficiency tests.
    Ott D; Thompson R; Song J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():98-106. PubMed ID: 28073053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple method to compare firing pin marks using stereomicroscope and Microsoft office (Windows 8) tools.
    Suresh R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():e1-e10. PubMed ID: 28629615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability and reproducibility of comparison decisions by firearms examiners.
    Monson KL; Smith ED; Peters EM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Sep; 68(5):1721-1740. PubMed ID: 37393551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons.
    Guyll M; Madon S; Yang Y; Burd KA; Wells G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 May; 120(20):e2210428120. PubMed ID: 37155908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the variability in the tool marks produced by modified blank firing pistols on fired 7.65 mm projectiles.
    Saribey AY; Çetin A; Uysal S; Çetin E
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 37453787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of characteristic marks on fired cartridge cases from five Chinese Norinco QSZ-92 9×19mm pistols.
    Zhang K; Luo Y; Zhou P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():78-86. PubMed ID: 28697397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance Evaluation of a Registered Ballistic Database Using the Evofinder® System.
    Li Y; Lin S; Luo Y; Mi Z
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1335-1344. PubMed ID: 30901079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic comparison and evaluation of impressions left by a firearm on fired cartridge cases.
    Riva F; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):637-47. PubMed ID: 24502645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.