These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31882253)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes of a novel presbyopia-correcting soft contact lens with a small aperture.
    Jun I; Cho JS; Kang MG; Lee GY; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Oct; 43(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 31882253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Efficacy of Pinhole Soft Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia.
    Park SY; Choi YJ; Jung JW; Choi M; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2019; 34(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
    Durrie DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():366-401. PubMed ID: 17471352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual function after implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega Cueto L; Belda-Salmerón L; Montés-Micó R; Fernández-Vega L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 26(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26797852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presbyopia Correction Using Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses in Patients With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
    Kaida T; Yukawa C; Higashi S; Minami K; Miyata K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jul; 46(4):234-237. PubMed ID: 31517737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of a new refractive multifocal contact lens for presbyopia.
    Kim DY; Ahn H; Lee S; Jun I; Seo KY; Kim SY; Kim TI
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8878. PubMed ID: 38632261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defocus curves of 4 presbyopia-correcting IOL designs: Diffractive panfocal, diffractive trifocal, segmental refractive, and extended-depth-of-focus.
    Böhm M; Petermann K; Hemkeppler E; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1625-1636. PubMed ID: 31706517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual Function after Implantation of a Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lens.
    Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega-Cueto L; Fernández-Vega L; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(2):152-164. PubMed ID: 31390634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized clinical evaluation of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Chu R; Stahl J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 158(3):436-46.e1. PubMed ID: 24932989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.
    García-Pérez JL; Gros-Otero J; Sánchez-Ramos C; Blázquez V; Contreras I
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28514944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial pupil versus contralateral balanced contact lens fit for presbyopia correction.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Apr; 77(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 25076468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual outcomes and safety after bilateral implantation of a trifocal presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in a Korean population: a prospective single-arm study.
    Kim TI; Chung TY; Kim MJ; Lee K; Hyon JY
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 32669090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Mulet ME
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 16023215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Implantation of an EDOF IOL and a Mix-and-Match Approach.
    Tarib I; Kasier I; Herbers C; Hagen P; Breyer D; Kaymak H; Klabe K; Lucchesi R; Teisch S; Diakonis VF; Hahn U; Fabian H; Kretz FTA
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 35(7):408-416. PubMed ID: 31298720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.