These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31883549)

  • 21. Drug repositioning of herbal compounds via a machine-learning approach.
    Kim E; Choi AS; Nam H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(Suppl 10):247. PubMed ID: 31138103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A probabilistic method to report predictions from a human liver microsomes stability QSAR model: a practical tool for drug discovery.
    Aliagas I; Gobbi A; Heffron T; Lee ML; Ortwine DF; Zak M; Khojasteh SC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Apr; 29(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 25708388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting Mouse Liver Microsomal Stability with "Pruned" Machine Learning Models and Public Data.
    Perryman AL; Stratton TP; Ekins S; Freundlich JS
    Pharm Res; 2016 Feb; 33(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 26415647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of machine learning regression algorithms and sample size on individualized behavioral prediction with functional connectivity features.
    Cui Z; Gong G
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():622-637. PubMed ID: 29870817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Machine learning-based methods for prediction of linear B-cell epitopes.
    Wang HW; Pai TW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1184():217-36. PubMed ID: 25048127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A step towards intelligent EBSD microscopy: machine-learning prediction of twin activity in MgAZ31.
    Sharma R; Chelladurai I; Orme AD; Miles MP; Giraud-Carrier C; Fullwood DT
    J Microsc; 2018 Oct; 272(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 30088277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Machine learning algorithms for predicting protein folding rates and stability of mutant proteins: comparison with statistical methods.
    Gromiha MM; Huang LT
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):490-502. PubMed ID: 21787301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shelf-stable electrophilic reagents for trifluoromethylthiolation.
    Shao X; Xu C; Lu L; Shen Q
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 May; 48(5):1227-36. PubMed ID: 25947041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Catalytic Intramolecular Aminofluorination, Oxyfluorination, and Carbofluorination with a Stable and Versatile Hypervalent Fluoroiodine Reagent.
    Yuan W; Szabó KJ
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2015 Jul; 54(29):8533-7. PubMed ID: 26069071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of machine learning and nonlinear statistical tools for ADME prediction.
    Sakiyama Y
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 5(2):149-69. PubMed ID: 19239395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Materials discovery by chemical analogy: role of oxidation states in structure prediction.
    Davies DW; Butler KT; Isayev O; Walsh A
    Faraday Discuss; 2018 Oct; 211(0):553-568. PubMed ID: 30027179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Varying Training Set Composition and Size on Support Vector Machine-Based Prediction of Active Compounds.
    Rodríguez-Pérez R; Vogt M; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):710-716. PubMed ID: 28376613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectively Identifying Compound-Protein Interactions by Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Examples.
    Cheng Z; Zhou S; Wang Y; Liu H; Guan J; Chen YP
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(6):1832-1843. PubMed ID: 28113437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multisite prediction of 4-week and 52-week treatment outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis: a machine learning approach.
    Koutsouleris N; Kahn RS; Chekroud AM; Leucht S; Falkai P; Wobrock T; Derks EM; Fleischhacker WW; Hasan A
    Lancet Psychiatry; 2016 Oct; 3(10):935-946. PubMed ID: 27569526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PCP-ML: protein characterization package for machine learning.
    Eickholt J; Wang Z
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Nov; 7():810. PubMed ID: 25406415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
    Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
    Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure prediction using machine learning and time series in optical network.
    Wang Z; Zhang M; Wang D; Song C; Liu M; Li J; Lou L; Liu Z
    Opt Express; 2017 Aug; 25(16):18553-18565. PubMed ID: 29041054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Smooth Bayesian network model for the prediction of future high-cost patients with COPD.
    Lin S; Zhang Q; Chen F; Luo L; Chen L; Zhang W
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():147-155. PubMed ID: 31029256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.
    Russo DP; Zorn KM; Clark AM; Zhu H; Ekins S
    Mol Pharm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):4361-4370. PubMed ID: 30114914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.