These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31883752)

  • 1. Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Online Information on Social Fertility Preservation.
    Shao YH; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):561-567. PubMed ID: 31883752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal births after caesarean: what does Google think about it?
    Bantan N; Abenhaim HA
    Women Birth; 2015 Mar; 28(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 25458612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online information for women and their families regarding reduced fetal movements is of variable quality, readability and accountability.
    Farrant K; Heazell AEP
    Midwifery; 2016 Mar; 34():72-78. PubMed ID: 26867705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Websites about, not for, adolescents? A systematic analysis of online fertility preservation information for adolescent and young adult cancer patients.
    Ruiz S; Mintz R; Sijecic A; Eggers M; Hoffman AS; Woodard T; Bjornard KL; Hoefgen H; Sandheinrich T; Omurtag K; Housten AJ
    J Cancer Surviv; 2024 Aug; 18(4):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 37145331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality.
    Robins S; Barr HJ; Idelson R; Lambert S; Zelkowitz P
    Interact J Med Res; 2016 Oct; 5(4):e25. PubMed ID: 27769954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No. 356-Egg Freezing for Age-Related Fertility Decline.
    Saumet J; Petropanagos A; Buzaglo K; McMahon E; Warraich G; Mahutte N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Mar; 40(3):356-368. PubMed ID: 29223749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer.
    Narwani V; Nalamada K; Lee M; Kothari P; Lakhani R
    Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 25491544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current Status of Websites Offering Information to Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Caregivers: Time for Reform?
    Manivannan S; Baskaran R; Fisher J; Tasker I; Zaben M
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():e419-e427. PubMed ID: 34229103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is fertility preservation a part of comprehensive cancer care in the USA? A study of NCI-designated cancer center websites.
    Vest AN; Kuete NT; Mehta A
    J Cancer Surviv; 2021 Dec; 15(6):906-911. PubMed ID: 33454796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation: An assessment of quality and readability of web-based information aimed at patients.
    Seymour N; Lakhani R; Hartley B; Cochrane L; Jephson C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16(6):321-5. PubMed ID: 26154560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information.
    de Man AM; Rashedi A; Nelen W; Anazodo A; Rademaker A; de Roo S; Beerendonk C; Woodruff TK
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2020 Sep; 23(3):170-178. PubMed ID: 30230389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.