BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31885440)

  • 1. The Role of Reproductive Justice Movements in Challenging South Korea's Abortion Ban.
    Kim S; Young N; Lee Y
    Health Hum Rights; 2019 Dec; 21(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 31885440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive Rights or Reproductive Justice? Lessons from Argentina.
    Morgan L
    Health Hum Rights; 2015 Jun; 17(1):E136-47. PubMed ID: 26204578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expanding reproductive justice through a supportability reparative justice framework: the case of abortion in South Africa.
    Macleod CI
    Cult Health Sex; 2019 Jan; 21(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 29613849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articulating reproductive justice through reparative justice: case studies of abortion in Great Britain and South Africa.
    Macleod CI; Beynon-Jones S; Toerien M
    Cult Health Sex; 2017 May; 19(5):601-615. PubMed ID: 27885958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion law reform in Nepal.
    Upreti M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Aug; 126(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 24890742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decriminalization of abortion in Mexico City: the effects on women's reproductive rights.
    Becker D; Díaz Olavarrieta C
    Am J Public Health; 2013 Apr; 103(4):590-3. PubMed ID: 23409907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achieving transparency in implementing abortion laws.
    Cook RJ; Erdman JN; Dickens BM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 99(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 17889879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human rights dynamics of abortion law reform.
    Cook RJ; Dickens BM
    Hum Rights Q; 2003 Feb; 25(1):1-59. PubMed ID: 15719517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!
    Johari V; Jadhav U
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Pro-life" absolutes, feminist challenges: the fundamentalist narrative of Irish abortion law 1986-1992.
    Fletcher R
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1998; 36(1):1-62. PubMed ID: 16184660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Irish Journey: Removing the shackles of abortion restrictions in Ireland.
    Taylor M; Spillane A; Arulkumaran SS
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jan; 62():36-48. PubMed ID: 31395317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal barriers to access abortion services through a human rights lens: the Uruguayan experience.
    Berro Pizzarossa L
    Reprod Health Matters; 2018 Dec; 26(52):1422664. PubMed ID: 29338662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
    Davis SE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. We must all support women in the fight for abortion.
    The Lancet
    Lancet; 2019 May; 393(10186):2099. PubMed ID: 31226031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.