336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31886254)
1. Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.
Liu G; Cao T; Hu L; Zheng J; Pang L; Hu P; Gu Y; Shi H
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8213215. PubMed ID: 31886254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of quantification errors in pelvic and spinal lesions caused by ignoring higher photon attenuation of bone in [18F]NaF PET/MR.
Schramm G; Maus J; Hofheinz F; Petr J; Lougovski A; Beuthien-Baumann B; Oehme L; Platzek I; van den Hoff J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6468-76. PubMed ID: 26520736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology: initial results.
Schäfer JF; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Gückel B; Bezrukov I; Pfannenberg CA; Reimold M; Ebinger M; Fuchs J; Claussen CD; Schwenzer NF
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):220-31. PubMed ID: 24877983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body PET/MRI: the effect of bone attenuation during MR-based attenuation correction in oncology imaging.
Aznar MC; Sersar R; Saabye J; Ladefoged CN; Andersen FL; Rasmussen JH; Löfgren J; Beyer T
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 24780817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.
Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Mateo J; Machac J; Narula J; Fuster V; Fayad ZA
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 23296082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-Body PET/MR Imaging: Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel Model-Based MR Attenuation Correction Method Including Bone.
Paulus DH; Quick HH; Geppert C; Fenchel M; Zhan Y; Hermosillo G; Faul D; Boada F; Friedman KP; Koesters T
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jul; 56(7):1061-6. PubMed ID: 26025957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 56(6):877-83. PubMed ID: 25858043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardized Uptake Values from PET/MRI in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Organ-based Comparison With PET/CT.
Pujara AC; Raad RA; Ponzo F; Wassong C; Babb JS; Moy L; Melsaether AN
Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):264-73. PubMed ID: 26843433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical assessment of MR-guided 3-class and 4-class attenuation correction in PET/MR.
Arabi H; Rager O; Alem A; Varoquaux A; Becker M; Zaidi H
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Apr; 17(2):264-76. PubMed ID: 25096328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Segmentation-based attenuation correction in positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance: erroneous tissue identification and its impact on positron emission tomography interpretation.
Brendle C; Schmidt H; Oergel A; Bezrukov I; Mueller M; Schraml C; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 25585210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
