These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31886520)

  • 1. Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection.
    Henshaw JM; Jones AG
    Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):487-494. PubMed ID: 31886520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reformulation of Fisher's runaway identifies the heritability of mate choices as a key parameter and highlights limitations of the hypothesis.
    Fry JD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232366. PubMed ID: 38264777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected.
    Hall DW; Kirkpatrick M; West B
    Evolution; 2000 Dec; 54(6):1862-9. PubMed ID: 11209766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of sexual preferences in quantitative characters.
    Karlin S; Raper J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Dec; 38(3):306-30. PubMed ID: 2293401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fisher's sons' effect in sexual selection: absent, intermittent or just low experimental power?
    Sharma MD; Wilson AJ; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):2464-2470. PubMed ID: 27575647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM.
    Heywood JS
    Evolution; 1989 Nov; 43(7):1387-1397. PubMed ID: 28564247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection: Another Darwinian process.
    Gayon J
    C R Biol; 2010 Feb; 333(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 20338530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y; Nee S
    Evolution; 1991 Sep; 45(6):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 28563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mating preferences of selfish sex chromosomes.
    Muralidhar P
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7761):376-379. PubMed ID: 31168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social runaway: Fisherian elaboration (or reduction) of socially selected traits via indirect genetic effects.
    Bailey NW; Kölliker M
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1549-1563. PubMed ID: 31273777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continual change in mate preferences.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):420-2. PubMed ID: 7566117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Runaway evolution from male-male competition.
    Moore AJ; McGlothlin JW; Wolf JB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Feb; 25(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 34784652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.